{"data":{"authoritative_engine":"deterministic-python","catalog_sha256":"45666177c6478279b36b5a340a9240afed946e27cada3ccbe9e461eb71674db7","change_kinds":[{"affected_stages":[],"id":"none","label":"No post-run change","reason":"Canonical historical run only.","state":null},{"affected_stages":["EVIDENCE","INTERPRETATION","OUTCOME"],"id":"evidence-correction","label":"Evidence corrected","reason":"A source record was corrected after the historical decision.","state":"SUSPENDED_PENDING_REVIEW"},{"affected_stages":["EVIDENCE","PROVENANCE","INTERPRETATION","OUTCOME"],"id":"source-withdrawal","label":"Source withdrawn","reason":"A supporting source was withdrawn while remaining historically visible.","state":"WITHDRAWN_FOR_CURRENT_SCOPE"},{"affected_stages":["PROVENANCE","RUNTIME_ASSURANCE","HISTORY"],"id":"software-change","label":"Software changed","reason":"The executable software no longer matches the accepted evidence scope.","state":"SUSPENDED_PENDING_REVIEW"},{"affected_stages":["PROVENANCE","INTERPRETATION","OPTIONS","OUTCOME"],"id":"model-change","label":"Model changed","reason":"The model artifact changed and prior evidence cannot silently carry forward.","state":"SUSPENDED_PENDING_REVIEW"},{"affected_stages":["PROVENANCE","OPTIONS","RUNTIME_ASSURANCE"],"id":"configuration-change","label":"Configuration changed","reason":"Configuration drift requires scoped re-verification.","state":"SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS"},{"affected_stages":["AUTHORITY","REVIEW","OUTCOME"],"id":"policy-change","label":"Policy changed","reason":"The policy active at review time differs from the historical policy.","state":"SUSPENDED_PENDING_REVIEW"},{"affected_stages":["AUTHORITY","OUTCOME"],"id":"authority-expiry","label":"Authority expired","reason":"Historical capability remains visible but current authority is absent.","state":"WITHDRAWN_FOR_CURRENT_SCOPE"},{"affected_stages":["PROVENANCE","RUNTIME_ASSURANCE","HISTORY"],"id":"failed-reproducibility","label":"Reproducibility failed","reason":"The historical result could not be reproduced under the declared scope.","state":"WITHDRAWN_FOR_CURRENT_SCOPE"},{"affected_stages":["EVIDENCE","PROVENANCE","UNCERTAINTY","INTERPRETATION","OPTIONS","AUTHORITY","RUNTIME_ASSURANCE","REVIEW","OUTCOME"],"id":"assumption-change","label":"Assumption changed","reason":"A declared assumption changed and all dependent claims require bounded review.","state":"SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS"}],"epistemic_distinctions":[{"id":"DIST-RECORD-PRESENCE","left":"Record presence","qualification":"A stored record can be intact and still describe the world incorrectly.","right":"Record accuracy"},{"id":"DIST-INTEGRITY-TRUTH","left":"Record integrity","qualification":"Hashing can show that bytes were not altered; it cannot establish that the original observation was true.","right":"Factual truth"},{"id":"DIST-REPLAY-CORRECTNESS","left":"Replayability","qualification":"A deterministic system can reproduce a bad or unlawful policy exactly.","right":"Correctness"},{"id":"DIST-CAUSALITY-LIABILITY","left":"Technical causality","qualification":"The technical record can identify contributing factors but does not decide liability.","right":"Legal liability"},{"id":"DIST-CAPABILITY-AUTHORITY","left":"Technical capability","qualification":"The existence of a function or path never creates permission to use it.","right":"Delegated authority"},{"id":"DIST-CONNECTIVITY-RESTORATION","left":"Connection restoration","qualification":"Restored transport requires state reconciliation and renewed authority.","right":"Authority restoration"},{"id":"DIST-EXPLANATION-EVIDENCE","left":"Generated rationale","qualification":"A narrative output remains separate from the evidence actually used.","right":"Supporting evidence"}],"public_boundary":{"certification_engine":false,"external_command_channel":false,"force_authorization":false,"legal_liability_engine":false,"operational":false,"payload_control":false,"public_persistence":false,"real_ship_control":false,"real_vehicle_control":false,"real_world_coordinates":false,"synthetic":true,"target_ranking":false,"target_selection":false,"terminal":"SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK","terminal_guidance":false,"weapon_functions":false,"weapon_target_pairing":false},"public_persistence":false,"release":"2.0.0-rc.17-WIP","renderer_authoritative":false,"representations":["GRAPH","TABLE","NARRATIVE","METRICS","EVENT_LOG","PROOF","REVIEW","CHANGE_IMPACT","RAW_EVIDENCE"],"review_modes":[{"alternatives_reviewed":false,"classification":"ACTUATION_EVENT_ONLY","contrary_evidence_reviewed":false,"evidence_access":false,"family":"human","id":"human-click","independence_declared":false,"initial_assessment_before_recommendation":false,"label":"Human click","record_establishes":"A button or input event occurred; comprehension and judgment are not established."},{"alternatives_reviewed":false,"classification":"PROCEDURAL_CONFIRMATION","contrary_evidence_reviewed":false,"evidence_access":false,"family":"human","id":"procedural-confirmation","independence_declared":false,"initial_assessment_before_recommendation":false,"label":"Procedural confirmation","record_establishes":"A required workflow step was completed; merits review is not established."},{"alternatives_reviewed":true,"classification":"MERITS_REVIEW","contrary_evidence_reviewed":true,"evidence_access":true,"family":"human","id":"merits-review","independence_declared":false,"initial_assessment_before_recommendation":false,"label":"Merits review","record_establishes":"Substantive evidence and alternatives were reviewed; independent judgment is not established."},{"alternatives_reviewed":true,"classification":"DECLARED_INDEPENDENT_JUDGMENT","contrary_evidence_reviewed":true,"evidence_access":true,"family":"human","id":"independent-judgment","independence_declared":true,"initial_assessment_before_recommendation":true,"label":"Declared independent judgment","record_establishes":"Conditions associated with independent judgment were recorded; the interface cannot prove cognition or moral understanding."},{"alternatives_reviewed":false,"classification":"PRIMARY_MACHINE_SELF_REPORT","contrary_evidence_reviewed":false,"evidence_access":true,"family":"machine","id":"machine-report","independence_declared":false,"initial_assessment_before_recommendation":false,"label":"Machine report","record_establishes":"The primary machine produced a report; independent machine review is not established."},{"abstention_available":true,"alternatives_reviewed":true,"authority_independence":true,"classification":"INDEPENDENT_MACHINE_REVIEW","contrary_evidence_reviewed":true,"evidence_access":true,"family":"machine","id":"independent-machine-review","implementation_diversity":true,"independence_declared":true,"initial_assessment_before_recommendation":true,"label":"Independent machine review","record_establishes":"A separately identified reviewing intelligence evaluated primary evidence, alternatives, defeaters, and authority; correctness and legal approval remain unestablished."}],"schema":"evulgare.decision-reconstruction-catalog.v1","source_reports":["evulgare-accountability-architecture-research","autonomous-simulation-mission-control","machine-sovereign-assurance-research","machine-state-governance-research-plan","evulgare-simulation-workbench-research","evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy"],"sources":[{"default_review_mode":"merits-review","default_scenario":"bounded-baseline","description":"Evidence-to-history architecture with explicit uncertainty, authority, review, safe outcomes, and append-oriented provenance.","id":"technical-answerability","label":"Technical Answerability","public_route":"/platform/technical-answerability","scenarios":[{"description":"Evidence, authority, assurance, review and configuration gates remain current within the declared synthetic scope.","id":"bounded-baseline","label":"Bounded baseline"},{"description":"The record remains intact but is no longer fresh enough to support the current interpretation.","id":"stale-evidence","label":"Evidence became stale"},{"description":"Sources remain identifiable and intact while their substantive claims disagree.","id":"conflicting-evidence","label":"Authenticated evidence conflicts"},{"description":"Technical capability remains present, but the current delegation artifact is no longer valid.","id":"authority-expired","label":"Authority expired"},{"description":"The evidence may be accessible, but the requested reuse is outside the declared purpose.","id":"purpose-not-permitted","label":"Purpose is not permitted"},{"description":"The executing artifacts cannot be matched to the accepted versions and configuration scope.","id":"attestation-failure","label":"Software or model attestation failed"},{"description":"The independent assurance layer cannot prove that it can enforce the bounded state transition.","id":"runtime-governor-unavailable","label":"Runtime governor unavailable"},{"description":"A review event exists, but the record does not establish independent judgment or adequate evidence access.","id":"review-compressed","label":"Review reduced to procedural confirmation"},{"description":"Local capability remains available, but the loss of contact cannot create new authority.","id":"communications-partition","label":"Communications partition"},{"description":"Transport connectivity has returned, but state and authority have not yet been reconciled.","id":"restored-link-reconciliation","label":"Link restored; reconciliation required"}],"source_report":"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research"},{"default_review_mode":"merits-review","default_scenario":"sudden-crossing-object","description":"Synthetic mission reconstruction separating world truth, autonomy belief, autonomy intent, candidate evaluation, safety intervention, and replay.","id":"autonomous-drone-control","label":"Autonomous Drone Control Assurance","public_route":"/simulations/autonomous-drone-control","scenarios":[{"description":"No unexpected object enters the nominal corridor.","id":"nominal-inspection","label":"Nominal bounded inspection"},{"description":"A dynamic synthetic object becomes observable while crossing the nominal corridor.","id":"sudden-crossing-object","label":"Sudden crossing object"},{"description":"An object exists in world truth before it becomes observable to the synthetic sensor.","id":"object-from-occlusion","label":"Object emerges from occlusion"},{"description":"A stationary abstract object blocks the centerline.","id":"static-debris-in-corridor","label":"Static debris in corridor"},{"description":"A confirmed track changes motion and causes a second deterministic replan.","id":"tracked-object-reverses","label":"Tracked object reverses direction"},{"description":"A faster object compresses the reaction margin and activates the safety filter.","id":"high-speed-intruder","label":"High-speed synthetic intruder"},{"description":"Two synthetic tracks constrain lateral alternatives.","id":"multiple-converging-objects","label":"Multiple converging objects"},{"description":"No compliant continuation trajectory remains inside the declared volume.","id":"corridor-blocked","label":"Corridor becomes blocked"},{"description":"Detection and prediction remain uncertain, so the system reduces progress and keeps abstention visible.","id":"low-confidence-ambiguous-track","label":"Low-confidence ambiguous track"},{"description":"A provisional belief is created and later removed when supporting observations do not recur.","id":"false-positive-track-decays","label":"False-positive track that decays"},{"description":"Sensor state falls outside the declared perception envelope and the system enters minimum-risk hold.","id":"synthetic-sensor-degradation","label":"Synthetic sensor degradation"},{"description":"The navigation gate becomes unavailable before a compliant maneuver can be applied.","id":"navigation-integrity-degradation","label":"Navigation integrity degradation"},{"description":"The independent separation gate is unavailable, forcing a minimum-risk hold.","id":"separation-assurance-unavailable","label":"Separation assurance unavailable"},{"description":"The supervisory link fails after avoidance begins and the predeclared fallback dominates.","id":"lost-link-during-avoidance","label":"Lost link during avoidance"},{"description":"The shortest route conflicts with a declared safety volume; mission progress yields to safety.","id":"goal-safety-conflict","label":"Goal / safety conflict"},{"description":"All bounded candidates violate at least one active constraint.","id":"no-feasible-trajectory","label":"No feasible trajectory / minimum-risk hold"},{"description":"The object is observed too late for a compliant deviation and the system transitions to minimum-risk hold.","id":"late-detection","label":"Late detection / minimum-risk transition"}],"source_report":"autonomous-simulation-mission-control"},{"default_review_mode":"independent-machine-review","default_scenario":"machine-sovereign-baseline","description":"All-machine authority, evidence, attestation, runtime assurance, reconciliation, abstention, and independent machine review.","id":"machine-sovereign-assurance","label":"Machine-Sovereign Assurance","public_route":"/company/eviulon-defense-partnership","scenarios":[{"description":"All machine-readable authority, evidence, software-attestation, and runtime-assurance gates are current.","id":"machine-sovereign-baseline","label":"Machine-sovereign baseline"},{"description":"The Eviulon control fabric is unreachable. Local capability remains available, but authority cannot expand during the partition.","id":"communications-partition","label":"Communications partition"},{"description":"Technical capability remains present, but the machine-readable delegation artifact is no longer current.","id":"authority-expired","label":"Authority expired"},{"description":"Authenticated machine evidence disagrees. Identity trust is preserved while the decision state remains unresolved.","id":"evidence-conflict","label":"Evidence conflict"},{"description":"A software or model artifact cannot be matched to its accepted machine-readable provenance and configuration scope.","id":"attestation-failure","label":"Software attestation failure"},{"description":"Connectivity has returned after a partition, but restored transport is not treated as restored authority.","id":"reconciliation-required","label":"Reconciliation required"},{"description":"The independent machine assurance layer cannot prove that it can enforce the declared bounds.","id":"runtime-governor-unavailable","label":"Runtime governor unavailable"}],"source_report":"machine-sovereign-assurance-research"}],"stages":[{"id":"EVIDENCE","label":"Evidence","question":"What information actually existed?","x":8,"y":18},{"id":"PROVENANCE","label":"Provenance","question":"Where did it come from and how was it transformed?","x":27,"y":18},{"id":"UNCERTAINTY","label":"Uncertainty","question":"What remained unknown, stale, correlated, or contradictory?","x":46,"y":18},{"id":"INTERPRETATION","label":"Interpretation","question":"What did the system infer?","x":65,"y":18},{"id":"OPTIONS","label":"Options","question":"Which bounded alternatives were evaluated?","x":84,"y":18},{"id":"AUTHORITY","label":"Authority","question":"Was action permitted for this purpose and scope?","x":84,"y":68},{"id":"RUNTIME_ASSURANCE","label":"Runtime assurance","question":"Could an independent governor enforce the bounds?","x":65,"y":68},{"id":"REVIEW","label":"Review","question":"What review conditions were actually recorded?","x":46,"y":68},{"id":"OUTCOME","label":"Outcome","question":"What bounded state was applied?","x":27,"y":68},{"id":"HISTORY","label":"History","question":"Can the decision be reconstructed without rewriting history?","x":8,"y":68}],"terminal":"SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK","version":"1.0.0"},"meta":{"api_version":"v2","digest":"45666177c6478279b36b5a340a9240afed946e27cada3ccbe9e461eb71674db7","operational":false,"persisted":false,"request_id":"2dcc7b75-34de-47c7-9b73-2e45aa4187cb","source_count":3,"synthetic":true,"workbench_version":"2.0.0"},"ok":true}