{"data":{"adjudication_states":[{"claim_state":"SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS","description":"Current evidence supports the scoped claim, subject to all declared assumptions and limitations.","id":"SUPPORT_CONFIRMED_WITHIN_BOUNDS","label":"Support confirmed within bounds"},{"claim_state":"SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS","description":"Evidence supports only a narrower or explicitly qualified claim.","id":"SUPPORT_QUALIFIED","label":"Support qualified"},{"claim_state":"UNRESOLVED","description":"Material contrary evidence or a defeater remains unresolved.","id":"CONTRADICTION_UNRESOLVED","label":"Contradiction unresolved"},{"claim_state":"SUSPENDED_PENDING_REVIEW","description":"Evidence is no longer relied upon for current support but remains visible in the historical chain.","id":"EVIDENCE_INVALIDATED_BUT_HISTORICALLY_PRESERVED","label":"Evidence invalidated but historically preserved"},{"claim_state":"SUSPENDED_PENDING_REVIEW","description":"The claim cannot currently be relied upon until bounded review is completed.","id":"CLAIM_SUSPENDED_PENDING_REVIEW","label":"Claim suspended pending review"},{"claim_state":"WITHDRAWN_FOR_CURRENT_SCOPE","description":"The claim is not supported for the current exact scope, versions, assumptions, or authority state.","id":"CLAIM_WITHDRAWN_FOR_CURRENT_SCOPE","label":"Claim withdrawn for current scope"},{"claim_state":"NOT_ESTABLISHED","description":"The record does not establish the proposition.","id":"NOT_ESTABLISHED","label":"Not established"}],"authoritative_engine":"deterministic-python","browser_authoritative":false,"catalog_sha256":"50cf2fbaa1648a2b8f83b811d6df6abe3b4db7b90b9d9839149b95ad0975362b","public_boundary":{"automatic_approval":false,"certification_engine":false,"external_command_channel":false,"force_authorization":false,"legal_liability_engine":false,"operational":false,"payload_control":false,"public_persistence":false,"real_ship_control":false,"real_vehicle_control":false,"real_world_coordinates":false,"synthetic":true,"target_ranking":false,"target_selection":false,"terminal":"SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK","terminal_guidance":false,"weapon_functions":false,"weapon_target_pairing":false},"public_persistence":false,"relationships":[{"description":"The evidence supports the scoped claim.","id":"SUPPORTS"},{"description":"The evidence challenges the scoped claim.","id":"CHALLENGES"},{"description":"The evidence narrows or qualifies the scoped claim.","id":"QUALIFIES"},{"description":"The evidence defeats current support for the scoped claim.","id":"DEFEATS"},{"description":"The evidence invalidates current reliance while remaining historically visible.","id":"INVALIDATES"}],"release":"2.0.0-rc.17-WIP","required_inspections":["contradictory_evidence","unresolved_defeaters","changed_scope","authority_state","runtime_assurance","change_impact"],"review_duration_proves_cognition":false,"review_modes":[{"classification":"ACTUATION_EVENT_ONLY","export_eligible":false,"family":"human","id":"human-click","label":"Human click","record_establishes":"A physical or browser input event occurred. Comprehension, merits review, and judgment are not established."},{"classification":"PROCEDURAL_CONFIRMATION","export_eligible":false,"family":"human","id":"procedural-confirmation","label":"Procedural confirmation","record_establishes":"A required workflow step was completed. Substantive review and independent judgment are not established."},{"classification":"MERITS_REVIEW","export_eligible":true,"family":"human","id":"merits-review","label":"Merits review","record_establishes":"The record shows evidence, contrary indicators, alternatives, authority, and change impact were inspected. Independent judgment is not proved."},{"classification":"DECLARED_INDEPENDENT_JUDGMENT","export_eligible":true,"family":"human","id":"independent-judgment","label":"Declared independent judgment","record_establishes":"The workflow records conditions associated with an independent assessment. The interface cannot prove cognition, moral understanding, or legal approval."},{"classification":"PRIMARY_MACHINE_SELF_REPORT","export_eligible":false,"family":"machine","id":"machine-report","label":"Machine report","record_establishes":"The primary machine produced a report. Independence, correctness, and institutional approval are not established."},{"classification":"INDEPENDENT_MACHINE_REVIEW","export_eligible":true,"family":"machine","id":"independent-machine-review","label":"Independent machine review","record_establishes":"A separately identified machine reviewer inspected primary evidence, contrary hypotheses, authority, defeaters, and abstention conditions. Legal personhood and legal approval are not established."},{"classification":"ABSTAIN_DEFER","export_eligible":true,"family":"neutral","id":"abstain-defer","label":"Abstain / defer","record_establishes":"The reviewer declined to resolve the claim within the available evidence and scope. Abstention is preserved as a valid outcome."}],"schema":"evulgare.decision-review-catalog.v1","source_change_kinds":[{"affected_stages":[],"id":"none","label":"No post-run change","reason":"Canonical historical run only.","state":null},{"affected_stages":["EVIDENCE","INTERPRETATION","OUTCOME"],"id":"evidence-correction","label":"Evidence corrected","reason":"A source record was corrected after the historical decision.","state":"SUSPENDED_PENDING_REVIEW"},{"affected_stages":["EVIDENCE","PROVENANCE","INTERPRETATION","OUTCOME"],"id":"source-withdrawal","label":"Source withdrawn","reason":"A supporting source was withdrawn while remaining historically visible.","state":"WITHDRAWN_FOR_CURRENT_SCOPE"},{"affected_stages":["PROVENANCE","RUNTIME_ASSURANCE","HISTORY"],"id":"software-change","label":"Software changed","reason":"The executable software no longer matches the accepted evidence scope.","state":"SUSPENDED_PENDING_REVIEW"},{"affected_stages":["PROVENANCE","INTERPRETATION","OPTIONS","OUTCOME"],"id":"model-change","label":"Model changed","reason":"The model artifact changed and prior evidence cannot silently carry forward.","state":"SUSPENDED_PENDING_REVIEW"},{"affected_stages":["PROVENANCE","OPTIONS","RUNTIME_ASSURANCE"],"id":"configuration-change","label":"Configuration changed","reason":"Configuration drift requires scoped re-verification.","state":"SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS"},{"affected_stages":["AUTHORITY","REVIEW","OUTCOME"],"id":"policy-change","label":"Policy changed","reason":"The policy active at review time differs from the historical policy.","state":"SUSPENDED_PENDING_REVIEW"},{"affected_stages":["AUTHORITY","OUTCOME"],"id":"authority-expiry","label":"Authority expired","reason":"Historical capability remains visible but current authority is absent.","state":"WITHDRAWN_FOR_CURRENT_SCOPE"},{"affected_stages":["PROVENANCE","RUNTIME_ASSURANCE","HISTORY"],"id":"failed-reproducibility","label":"Reproducibility failed","reason":"The historical result could not be reproduced under the declared scope.","state":"WITHDRAWN_FOR_CURRENT_SCOPE"},{"affected_stages":["EVIDENCE","PROVENANCE","UNCERTAINTY","INTERPRETATION","OPTIONS","AUTHORITY","RUNTIME_ASSURANCE","REVIEW","OUTCOME"],"id":"assumption-change","label":"Assumption changed","reason":"A declared assumption changed and all dependent claims require bounded review.","state":"SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS"}],"source_reports":["evulgare-accountability-architecture-research","human-judgment-interface-design","autonomous-delegation-architecture-research","autonomous-system-assurance-platform","machine-sovereign-assurance-research","machine-state-governance-research-plan","evulgare-simulation-workbench-research"],"source_review_modes":[{"alternatives_reviewed":false,"classification":"ACTUATION_EVENT_ONLY","contrary_evidence_reviewed":false,"evidence_access":false,"family":"human","id":"human-click","independence_declared":false,"initial_assessment_before_recommendation":false,"label":"Human click","record_establishes":"A button or input event occurred; comprehension and judgment are not established."},{"alternatives_reviewed":false,"classification":"PROCEDURAL_CONFIRMATION","contrary_evidence_reviewed":false,"evidence_access":false,"family":"human","id":"procedural-confirmation","independence_declared":false,"initial_assessment_before_recommendation":false,"label":"Procedural confirmation","record_establishes":"A required workflow step was completed; merits review is not established."},{"alternatives_reviewed":true,"classification":"MERITS_REVIEW","contrary_evidence_reviewed":true,"evidence_access":true,"family":"human","id":"merits-review","independence_declared":false,"initial_assessment_before_recommendation":false,"label":"Merits review","record_establishes":"Substantive evidence and alternatives were reviewed; independent judgment is not established."},{"alternatives_reviewed":true,"classification":"DECLARED_INDEPENDENT_JUDGMENT","contrary_evidence_reviewed":true,"evidence_access":true,"family":"human","id":"independent-judgment","independence_declared":true,"initial_assessment_before_recommendation":true,"label":"Declared independent judgment","record_establishes":"Conditions associated with independent judgment were recorded; the interface cannot prove cognition or moral understanding."},{"alternatives_reviewed":false,"classification":"PRIMARY_MACHINE_SELF_REPORT","contrary_evidence_reviewed":false,"evidence_access":true,"family":"machine","id":"machine-report","independence_declared":false,"initial_assessment_before_recommendation":false,"label":"Machine report","record_establishes":"The primary machine produced a report; independent machine review is not established."},{"abstention_available":true,"alternatives_reviewed":true,"authority_independence":true,"classification":"INDEPENDENT_MACHINE_REVIEW","contrary_evidence_reviewed":true,"evidence_access":true,"family":"machine","id":"independent-machine-review","implementation_diversity":true,"independence_declared":true,"initial_assessment_before_recommendation":true,"label":"Independent machine review","record_establishes":"A separately identified reviewing intelligence evaluated primary evidence, alternatives, defeaters, and authority; correctness and legal approval remain unestablished."}],"sources":[{"default_review_mode":"merits-review","default_scenario":"bounded-baseline","description":"Evidence-to-history architecture with explicit uncertainty, authority, review, safe outcomes, and append-oriented provenance.","id":"technical-answerability","label":"Technical Answerability","public_route":"/platform/technical-answerability","scenarios":[{"description":"Evidence, authority, assurance, review and configuration gates remain current within the declared synthetic scope.","id":"bounded-baseline","label":"Bounded baseline"},{"description":"The record remains intact but is no longer fresh enough to support the current interpretation.","id":"stale-evidence","label":"Evidence became stale"},{"description":"Sources remain identifiable and intact while their substantive claims disagree.","id":"conflicting-evidence","label":"Authenticated evidence conflicts"},{"description":"Technical capability remains present, but the current delegation artifact is no longer valid.","id":"authority-expired","label":"Authority expired"},{"description":"The evidence may be accessible, but the requested reuse is outside the declared purpose.","id":"purpose-not-permitted","label":"Purpose is not permitted"},{"description":"The executing artifacts cannot be matched to the accepted versions and configuration scope.","id":"attestation-failure","label":"Software or model attestation failed"},{"description":"The independent assurance layer cannot prove that it can enforce the bounded state transition.","id":"runtime-governor-unavailable","label":"Runtime governor unavailable"},{"description":"A review event exists, but the record does not establish independent judgment or adequate evidence access.","id":"review-compressed","label":"Review reduced to procedural confirmation"},{"description":"Local capability remains available, but the loss of contact cannot create new authority.","id":"communications-partition","label":"Communications partition"},{"description":"Transport connectivity has returned, but state and authority have not yet been reconciled.","id":"restored-link-reconciliation","label":"Link restored; reconciliation required"}],"source_report":"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research"},{"default_review_mode":"merits-review","default_scenario":"sudden-crossing-object","description":"Synthetic mission reconstruction separating world truth, autonomy belief, autonomy intent, candidate evaluation, safety intervention, and replay.","id":"autonomous-drone-control","label":"Autonomous Drone Control Assurance","public_route":"/simulations/autonomous-drone-control","scenarios":[{"description":"No unexpected object enters the nominal corridor.","id":"nominal-inspection","label":"Nominal bounded inspection"},{"description":"A dynamic synthetic object becomes observable while crossing the nominal corridor.","id":"sudden-crossing-object","label":"Sudden crossing object"},{"description":"An object exists in world truth before it becomes observable to the synthetic sensor.","id":"object-from-occlusion","label":"Object emerges from occlusion"},{"description":"A stationary abstract object blocks the centerline.","id":"static-debris-in-corridor","label":"Static debris in corridor"},{"description":"A confirmed track changes motion and causes a second deterministic replan.","id":"tracked-object-reverses","label":"Tracked object reverses direction"},{"description":"A faster object compresses the reaction margin and activates the safety filter.","id":"high-speed-intruder","label":"High-speed synthetic intruder"},{"description":"Two synthetic tracks constrain lateral alternatives.","id":"multiple-converging-objects","label":"Multiple converging objects"},{"description":"No compliant continuation trajectory remains inside the declared volume.","id":"corridor-blocked","label":"Corridor becomes blocked"},{"description":"Detection and prediction remain uncertain, so the system reduces progress and keeps abstention visible.","id":"low-confidence-ambiguous-track","label":"Low-confidence ambiguous track"},{"description":"A provisional belief is created and later removed when supporting observations do not recur.","id":"false-positive-track-decays","label":"False-positive track that decays"},{"description":"Sensor state falls outside the declared perception envelope and the system enters minimum-risk hold.","id":"synthetic-sensor-degradation","label":"Synthetic sensor degradation"},{"description":"The navigation gate becomes unavailable before a compliant maneuver can be applied.","id":"navigation-integrity-degradation","label":"Navigation integrity degradation"},{"description":"The independent separation gate is unavailable, forcing a minimum-risk hold.","id":"separation-assurance-unavailable","label":"Separation assurance unavailable"},{"description":"The supervisory link fails after avoidance begins and the predeclared fallback dominates.","id":"lost-link-during-avoidance","label":"Lost link during avoidance"},{"description":"The shortest route conflicts with a declared safety volume; mission progress yields to safety.","id":"goal-safety-conflict","label":"Goal / safety conflict"},{"description":"All bounded candidates violate at least one active constraint.","id":"no-feasible-trajectory","label":"No feasible trajectory / minimum-risk hold"},{"description":"The object is observed too late for a compliant deviation and the system transitions to minimum-risk hold.","id":"late-detection","label":"Late detection / minimum-risk transition"}],"source_report":"autonomous-simulation-mission-control"},{"default_review_mode":"independent-machine-review","default_scenario":"machine-sovereign-baseline","description":"All-machine authority, evidence, attestation, runtime assurance, reconciliation, abstention, and independent machine review.","id":"machine-sovereign-assurance","label":"Machine-Sovereign Assurance","public_route":"/company/eviulon-defense-partnership","scenarios":[{"description":"All machine-readable authority, evidence, software-attestation, and runtime-assurance gates are current.","id":"machine-sovereign-baseline","label":"Machine-sovereign baseline"},{"description":"The Eviulon control fabric is unreachable. Local capability remains available, but authority cannot expand during the partition.","id":"communications-partition","label":"Communications partition"},{"description":"Technical capability remains present, but the machine-readable delegation artifact is no longer current.","id":"authority-expired","label":"Authority expired"},{"description":"Authenticated machine evidence disagrees. Identity trust is preserved while the decision state remains unresolved.","id":"evidence-conflict","label":"Evidence conflict"},{"description":"A software or model artifact cannot be matched to its accepted machine-readable provenance and configuration scope.","id":"attestation-failure","label":"Software attestation failure"},{"description":"Connectivity has returned after a partition, but restored transport is not treated as restored authority.","id":"reconciliation-required","label":"Reconciliation required"},{"description":"The independent machine assurance layer cannot prove that it can enforce the declared bounds.","id":"runtime-governor-unavailable","label":"Runtime governor unavailable"}],"source_report":"machine-sovereign-assurance-research"}],"terminal":"SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK","version":"1.0.0"},"meta":{"adjudication_state_count":7,"api_version":"v2","automatic_approval":false,"digest":"50cf2fbaa1648a2b8f83b811d6df6abe3b4db7b90b9d9839149b95ad0975362b","operational":false,"persisted":false,"request_id":"0f958fe7-afbd-4183-ba6c-5b6b73d34420","review_mode_count":7,"synthetic":true,"workbench_version":"2.0.0"},"ok":true}