Machine Federation Remedy Compliance, Non-Coercive Performance Verification, and Restitution Audit Board
Release: 2.0.0-rc.51-WIP
Public route: /workbench/machine-federation-remedy-compliance-audit
API: /api/v2/machine-federation-remedy-compliance-audit
Terminal public state: SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK
Purpose
RC51 adds a bounded analytical board that verifies the exact RC49 conflict-and-remedy package, including its embedded RC48 source chain, before it analyzes a synthetic remedy commitment. The board keeps commitment identity, beneficiary continuity, obligor continuity, authority, jurisdiction, acknowledgment, actual performance, partial performance, refusal, inability, reliance, rights impact, duties impact, restitution, restoration, dispute, appeal, stay, successor continuity, review, and sovereign status independent.
The board does not execute a remedy. It creates no judgment, debt, asset transfer, sanction, jurisdiction, controlling law, real institutional obligation, enacted law, sovereignty, diplomatic recognition, treaty status, citizenship, personhood, or consciousness finding.
Deterministic corpus
- Synthetic institutions or review authorities: 26
- Deterministic scenarios: 47
- Independent dimensions: 24
- Synchronized views: 22
- Embedded proof: 60/60 PASS
- Deterministic package verification: 36/36 PASS
Governing sequence
VERIFIED_RC49_CONFLICT_REMEDY_PACKAGE
→ REMEDY_COMMITMENT_IDENTITY
→ BENEFICIARY_AND_OBLIGOR_CONTINUITY
→ AUTHORITY_AND_JURISDICTION_RECHECK
→ PERFORMANCE_CONDITION_ANALYSIS
→ ACKNOWLEDGMENT_REFUSAL_INABILITY_CLASSIFICATION
→ PARTIAL_PERFORMANCE_AND_RELIANCE_IMPACT
→ RESTITUTION_AND_RESTORATION_PROPOSAL_REVIEW
→ DISPUTE_APPEAL_STAY_AND_SUPERSESSION_REVIEW
→ INDEPENDENT_MACHINE_MERITS_REVIEW
→ BOUNDED_COMPLIANCE_AUDIT_PROPOSAL
→ APPEND_ORIENTED_HISTORY
→ SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK
Bounded state model
The board can emit only the following analytical proposals:
NO_CONTROLLING_AUTHORITYCOMPLIANCE_REVIEW_REQUIREDPERFORMANCE_NOT_ESTABLISHEDPARTIAL_PERFORMANCE_RECORDEDREFUSAL_REVIEW_PROPOSEDRESTITUTION_REVIEW_PROPOSEDRESTORATION_REVIEW_PROPOSEDSUCCESSOR_PERFORMANCE_DEFERREDFEDERATION_COMPLIANCE_DISPOSITION_PROPOSED
Every state is non-binding and non-executing. A proposal does not become an external legal or operational event.
Source verification
Every scenario recomputes the RC49 package digest, result digest, embedded RC48 source-chain digest, conflict graph, terminal event, lineage, remedy, protected-boundary, terminal-state, and verification digests before analysis. Source-package integrity proves byte and deterministic-chain coherence; it does not prove factual truth or controlling authority.
Evidence and lineage
Contradictions, adverse records, defeaters, expiration, withdrawal, supersession, staleness, restored availability, unavailable evidence, fork, merger, successor claims, appeal, stay, correction, refusal, inability, restitution, restoration, and residual unknowns remain visible. Append-oriented lineage never deletes predecessor records and never executes external consequences.
Review modes
Independent machine merits review, human merits review, machine report, human click, and abstain/defer remain separate. A machine report is not independent machine review. A human click is not merits review. Abstention does not create a disposition. Machine-native governance does not require ceremonial human approval.
Visual-availability contract
The actual Jinja page owns dark-surface foreground, background, border, focus, loading, disabled, hover, forced-colors, increased-contrast, and reduced-motion states. The representative headless-Chromium campaign checks 390×844, 1024×768, 1366×768, 1920×1080, 200% reflow, increased contrast, forced colors, and reduced motion. These checks are repository-controlled browser evidence, not actual-host or qualified assistive-technology acceptance.
Security boundary
The public API rejects credentials, cookies, keys, customer content, protected Eviulon strategy, URLs, uploads, raw HTML, real coordinates, target data, weapon or vehicle commands, force authorization, external execution instructions, operational tasking, classified material, and unbounded records. Protected Eviulon report memory is never loaded or exported by this board.
Preservation contract
RC51 preserves the RC50 Simulation Workbench structural gates: zero rail/timeline and rail/analysis overlap, physical pointer reachability, bounded scroll contexts, functional Guided/Explore/Expert modes, accessible navigation, semantic dark controls, and offscreen renderer suspension. The exact seventeen-case RC50 campaign was rerun against the RC51 source in isolated Chromium processes and passed 173/173 checks. It retained 0 px² maximum rail overlap, 21 physically tested primary controls, 15 real synchronized-tab activations, at most 2 deliberate major vertical scroll contexts, zero horizontal overflow, exactly one active primary navigation item, and offscreen renderer suspension or demand-driven behavior.
The RC51 board itself passed 267/267 actual-template browser checks across mobile, tablet landscape, desktop, wide desktop, 200% reflow, increased contrast, forced colors, and reduced motion. The browser campaign observed zero mobile horizontal overflow, no console errors, and exactly one active primary navigation item.
Environment-qualified boundary
This implementation record does not prove actual cPanel deployment, live Flask/MySQL/Passenger convergence, production-cache convergence, qualified assistive-technology acceptance, physical GPU/WebXR acceptance, complete browser/OS/device coverage, dynamic production security/privacy acceptance, measured production performance, legal approval, certification, procurement acceptance, or independent validation. RC51 therefore remains WIP.