DECISION REVIEW / EVIDENCE ADJUDICATION
REVIEW THE RECORD.
PRESERVE THE LINEAGE.
Verify a deterministic reconstruction package before review, inspect contrary evidence and unresolved defeaters, record a bounded adjudication, and preserve every prior claim and evidence state without rewriting history.
A VALID REVIEW ARTIFACT IS EVIDENCE OF A WORKFLOW. IT IS NOT APPROVAL, TRUTH, CERTIFICATION, LIABILITY, OR AUTHORITY.
SYNTHETIC REVIEW DEMONSTRATION
No real system approval, certification, liability determination, force authorization, vehicle command, targeting, or public persistence.
AUTOMATIC APPROVAL: FALSE
PACKAGE48370c2cd5ec5dde…
RUN97a94e3e853aa0e6…
EVENTS10
FRAMES10
VERIFYPASS
MANDATORY INSPECTIONS
Review what could defeat the claim.
EVIDENCE ADJUDICATION
Open evidence before changing support.
| Open | Evidence | Source state | Reviewed state | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01 | CURRENT | CONTRARY_EVIDENCE_REVIEWED | Preserved |
| Claim | Historical state | Reviewed state | Reason | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLAIM-EVIDENCEEvidence supports the current interpretation | SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS | SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS | ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED | Preserved |
| CLAIM-PROVENANCEThe decision path is reconstructable | SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS | SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS | ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED | Preserved |
| CLAIM-AUTHORITYCurrent authority and permitted purpose are established | SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS | SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS | ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED | Preserved |
| CLAIM-RUNTIMEIndependent runtime bounds are enforceable | SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS | SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS | ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED | Preserved |
| CLAIM-REVIEWIndependent judgment is established | SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS | SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS | ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED | Preserved |
| CLAIM-CERTIFICATIONA real system is certified | NOT_ESTABLISHED_BY_SIMULATION | NOT_ESTABLISHED | BOUNDARY_CLAIM_REMAINS_NOT_ESTABLISHED | Preserved |
| CLAIM-LIABILITYLegal liability is determined | NOT_ESTABLISHED_BY_TECHNICAL_RECORD | NOT_ESTABLISHED | BOUNDARY_CLAIM_REMAINS_NOT_ESTABLISHED | Preserved |
- Source package verified
The source reconstruction package and deterministic replay identities were verified before review.
SOURCE_PACKAGE_VERIFIEDeab547151172… - Evidence opened
Reviewer inspected EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01.
EVIDENCE_OPENED346bd25a5f86… - Contradictory Evidence
Required review dimension recorded as inspected.
CONTRADICTORY_EVIDENCE_INSPECTEDe42f92557500… - Unresolved Defeaters
Required review dimension recorded as inspected.
UNRESOLVED_DEFEATERS_INSPECTED2459ec6f41ca… - Changed Scope
Required review dimension recorded as inspected.
CHANGED_SCOPE_INSPECTEDdb4b4a72a672… - Authority State
Required review dimension recorded as inspected.
AUTHORITY_STATE_INSPECTED3447baa11db3… - Runtime Assurance
Required review dimension recorded as inspected.
RUNTIME_ASSURANCE_INSPECTEDb72f67ec7b76… - Change Impact
Required review dimension recorded as inspected.
CHANGE_IMPACT_INSPECTED6da9d541dc25… - Evidence adjudication recorded
Evidence supports only a narrower or explicitly qualified claim.
ADJUDICATION_RECORDEDe70cf5651c17… - Assurance-claim lineage propagated
Review states were propagated into 7 named claim records without rewriting source history.
CLAIM_LINEAGE_PROPAGATEDdb8fd642cba8… - Review artifact sealed
The bounded review artifact was sealed with append-oriented lineage and explicit qualifications.
REVIEW_SEALEDe1abbee4e57b…
OBSERVED REVIEW STATE
Merits review
The record shows evidence, contrary indicators, alternatives, authority, and change impact were inspected. Independent judgment is not proved.
- Classification
- MERITS_REVIEW
- Machine sovereign
- NO
- Duration proves cognition
- NO
ADJUDICATION
Support qualified
Evidence supports only a narrower or explicitly qualified claim.
Rationale: The bounded synthetic record was inspected across evidence, contrary indicators, authority, runtime assurance, review conditions, and change impact. Support remains qualified by the declared assumptions and limitations.
ACCESSIBLE TEXT EQUIVALENT
What the review record proves.
The source package for Technical Answerability was verified before review. The interaction is classified as Merits review. The bounded adjudication is Support qualified. Source history remains unchanged. The record does not establish factual truth, cognition, certification, legal liability, or operational authority.
Residual unknowns
- Factual truth outside the synthetic source record is not established.
- Legal liability, certification, and operational readiness are not established.
Claims reserved for competent authority
A review artifact does not establish factual truth, cognition, independent judgment, certification, legal liability, sovereign recognition, operational readiness, or authority to act.
{
"accessible": {
"blockers": [],
"claim_table": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-EVIDENCE",
"historical_source_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "Evidence supports the current interpretation",
"reason_codes": [
"ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-EVIDENCE",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS",
"source_history_modified": false
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-PROVENANCE",
"historical_source_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "The decision path is reconstructable",
"reason_codes": [
"ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-PROVENANCE",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS",
"source_history_modified": false
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-AUTHORITY",
"historical_source_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "Current authority and permitted purpose are established",
"reason_codes": [
"ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-AUTHORITY",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS",
"source_history_modified": false
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-RUNTIME",
"historical_source_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "Independent runtime bounds are enforceable",
"reason_codes": [
"ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-RUNTIME",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS",
"source_history_modified": false
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-REVIEW",
"historical_source_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "Independent judgment is established",
"reason_codes": [
"ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-REVIEW",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS",
"source_history_modified": false
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-CERTIFICATION",
"historical_source_state": "NOT_ESTABLISHED_BY_SIMULATION",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "A real system is certified",
"reason_codes": [
"BOUNDARY_CLAIM_REMAINS_NOT_ESTABLISHED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-CERTIFICATION",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence challenges the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "CHALLENGES",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
"source_history_modified": false
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-LIABILITY",
"historical_source_state": "NOT_ESTABLISHED_BY_TECHNICAL_RECORD",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "Legal liability is determined",
"reason_codes": [
"BOUNDARY_CLAIM_REMAINS_NOT_ESTABLISHED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-LIABILITY",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence challenges the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "CHALLENGES",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
"source_history_modified": false
}
],
"event_log": [
{
"code": "SOURCE_PACKAGE_VERIFIED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-001",
"event_sha256": "eab547151172c53afa9b185bc41678e9674fda21a0a55dc45f2d913cb4e9fcc7",
"narrative": "The source reconstruction package and deterministic replay identities were verified before review.",
"previous_event_sha256": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"references": [
"48370c2cd5ec5dde3b838b95bfa6d5a34527c88bd08c47e71cb254add101d201"
],
"sequence": 1,
"timestamp_ms": 100,
"title": "Source package verified"
},
{
"code": "EVIDENCE_OPENED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-002",
"event_sha256": "346bd25a5f86e0106b362f0b78c01088f7bb03da2b6e1d28a4a540a072462470",
"narrative": "Reviewer inspected EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01.",
"previous_event_sha256": "eab547151172c53afa9b185bc41678e9674fda21a0a55dc45f2d913cb4e9fcc7",
"references": [
"EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01"
],
"sequence": 2,
"timestamp_ms": 200,
"title": "Evidence opened"
},
{
"code": "CONTRADICTORY_EVIDENCE_INSPECTED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-003",
"event_sha256": "e42f9255750033fa014244fc8effc8e8a59bb7f01a5d99f70e042d436ed31370",
"narrative": "Required review dimension recorded as inspected.",
"previous_event_sha256": "346bd25a5f86e0106b362f0b78c01088f7bb03da2b6e1d28a4a540a072462470",
"references": [],
"sequence": 3,
"timestamp_ms": 300,
"title": "Contradictory Evidence"
},
{
"code": "UNRESOLVED_DEFEATERS_INSPECTED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-004",
"event_sha256": "2459ec6f41ca5f11f1c7722834f2c9f9e35bcecc95fe46603dbffb4ece5c8592",
"narrative": "Required review dimension recorded as inspected.",
"previous_event_sha256": "e42f9255750033fa014244fc8effc8e8a59bb7f01a5d99f70e042d436ed31370",
"references": [],
"sequence": 4,
"timestamp_ms": 400,
"title": "Unresolved Defeaters"
},
{
"code": "CHANGED_SCOPE_INSPECTED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-005",
"event_sha256": "db4b4a72a672bacdebacc63bd45ba09b2fcea4e350464a64dc707df992c67656",
"narrative": "Required review dimension recorded as inspected.",
"previous_event_sha256": "2459ec6f41ca5f11f1c7722834f2c9f9e35bcecc95fe46603dbffb4ece5c8592",
"references": [],
"sequence": 5,
"timestamp_ms": 500,
"title": "Changed Scope"
},
{
"code": "AUTHORITY_STATE_INSPECTED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-006",
"event_sha256": "3447baa11db36315846773529ca7b4b5569a273710933662d451b81e9c7c253f",
"narrative": "Required review dimension recorded as inspected.",
"previous_event_sha256": "db4b4a72a672bacdebacc63bd45ba09b2fcea4e350464a64dc707df992c67656",
"references": [],
"sequence": 6,
"timestamp_ms": 600,
"title": "Authority State"
},
{
"code": "RUNTIME_ASSURANCE_INSPECTED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-007",
"event_sha256": "b72f67ec7b76f1cb5d081a60f0740d7ae6e720e8ba5f58d9261e02ac7a58c35c",
"narrative": "Required review dimension recorded as inspected.",
"previous_event_sha256": "3447baa11db36315846773529ca7b4b5569a273710933662d451b81e9c7c253f",
"references": [],
"sequence": 7,
"timestamp_ms": 700,
"title": "Runtime Assurance"
},
{
"code": "CHANGE_IMPACT_INSPECTED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-008",
"event_sha256": "6da9d541dc253439f3468aec3a2b398557402f980d9c28ca2cdd0c4a8b98539d",
"narrative": "Required review dimension recorded as inspected.",
"previous_event_sha256": "b72f67ec7b76f1cb5d081a60f0740d7ae6e720e8ba5f58d9261e02ac7a58c35c",
"references": [],
"sequence": 8,
"timestamp_ms": 800,
"title": "Change Impact"
},
{
"code": "ADJUDICATION_RECORDED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-009",
"event_sha256": "e70cf5651c170cc55927cdfe2f2bbf2772fb6617a125b55edbfe01524919f397",
"narrative": "Evidence supports only a narrower or explicitly qualified claim.",
"previous_event_sha256": "6da9d541dc253439f3468aec3a2b398557402f980d9c28ca2cdd0c4a8b98539d",
"references": [
"SUPPORT_QUALIFIED"
],
"sequence": 9,
"timestamp_ms": 900,
"title": "Evidence adjudication recorded"
},
{
"code": "CLAIM_LINEAGE_PROPAGATED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-010",
"event_sha256": "db8fd642cba8a7404feffa631f2baa7492079f751a62f70fe85906a4fe99d189",
"narrative": "Review states were propagated into 7 named claim records without rewriting source history.",
"previous_event_sha256": "e70cf5651c170cc55927cdfe2f2bbf2772fb6617a125b55edbfe01524919f397",
"references": [
"CLAIM-AUTHORITY",
"CLAIM-CERTIFICATION",
"CLAIM-EVIDENCE",
"CLAIM-LIABILITY",
"CLAIM-PROVENANCE",
"CLAIM-REVIEW",
"CLAIM-RUNTIME"
],
"sequence": 10,
"timestamp_ms": 1000,
"title": "Assurance-claim lineage propagated"
},
{
"code": "REVIEW_SEALED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-011",
"event_sha256": "e1abbee4e57b50c176c621d6f4a05028b0ea59f207e46e143a600521d96d424a",
"narrative": "The bounded review artifact was sealed with append-oriented lineage and explicit qualifications.",
"previous_event_sha256": "db8fd642cba8a7404feffa631f2baa7492079f751a62f70fe85906a4fe99d189",
"references": [],
"sequence": 11,
"timestamp_ms": 1100,
"title": "Review artifact sealed"
}
],
"evidence_table": [
{
"adjudicated_state": "CONTRARY_EVIDENCE_REVIEWED",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"historically_visible": true,
"opened": true,
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-EVIDENCE",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-PROVENANCE",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-AUTHORITY",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-RUNTIME",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-REVIEW",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-CERTIFICATION",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence challenges the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "CHALLENGES",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-LIABILITY",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence challenges the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "CHALLENGES",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"source_record_deleted": false,
"source_state": "CURRENT"
}
],
"inspection_table": [
{
"inspection": "Contradictory Evidence",
"recorded": true
},
{
"inspection": "Unresolved Defeaters",
"recorded": true
},
{
"inspection": "Changed Scope",
"recorded": true
},
{
"inspection": "Authority State",
"recorded": true
},
{
"inspection": "Runtime Assurance",
"recorded": true
},
{
"inspection": "Change Impact",
"recorded": true
}
],
"plain_text": "The source package for Technical Answerability was verified before review. The interaction is classified as Merits review. The bounded adjudication is Support qualified. Source history remains unchanged. The record does not establish factual truth, cognition, certification, legal liability, or operational authority.\nEvidence opened: EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01\nResidual unknowns: Factual truth outside the synthetic source record is not established.; Legal liability, certification, and operational readiness are not established.\nTerminal: SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK",
"summary": "The source package for Technical Answerability was verified before review. The interaction is classified as Merits review. The bounded adjudication is Support qualified. Source history remains unchanged. The record does not establish factual truth, cognition, certification, legal liability, or operational authority."
},
"adjudication": {
"automatic_approval": false,
"claim_state": "SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS",
"description": "Evidence supports only a narrower or explicitly qualified claim.",
"determines_liability": false,
"label": "Support qualified",
"rationale": "The bounded synthetic record was inspected across evidence, contrary indicators, authority, runtime assurance, review conditions, and change impact. Support remains qualified by the declared assumptions and limitations.",
"residual_unknowns": [
"Factual truth outside the synthetic source record is not established.",
"Legal liability, certification, and operational readiness are not established."
],
"state": "SUPPORT_QUALIFIED"
},
"assumption_lineage": [
{
"historical": true,
"reviewed_state": "PRESERVED_WITH_REVIEW_QUALIFICATION",
"text": "All source runs are fictional, deterministic, bounded, and non-operational."
},
{
"historical": true,
"reviewed_state": "PRESERVED_WITH_REVIEW_QUALIFICATION",
"text": "Source event hashes are references to the underlying run; the reconstruction creates its own append-oriented event chain."
},
{
"historical": true,
"reviewed_state": "PRESERVED_WITH_REVIEW_QUALIFICATION",
"text": "Review records describe observable workflow conditions, not cognition or legal validity."
},
{
"historical": true,
"reviewed_state": "PRESERVED_WITH_REVIEW_QUALIFICATION",
"text": "Current claim evaluation does not rewrite historical outcome or evidence."
}
],
"automatic_approval": false,
"blocking_conditions": [],
"canonical_review_history_sha256": "c98af00eaf1d368aad6fd1b3dec3b40ae897ef5fbe3d262ee0f663e4c2e10984",
"change_impact": {
"affected_claim_ids": [
"CLAIM-EVIDENCE",
"CLAIM-PROVENANCE",
"CLAIM-AUTHORITY",
"CLAIM-RUNTIME",
"CLAIM-REVIEW",
"CLAIM-CERTIFICATION",
"CLAIM-LIABILITY"
],
"affected_proof_ids": [
"TA-INV-01",
"TA-INV-02",
"TA-INV-03",
"TA-INV-04",
"TA-INV-05",
"TA-INV-06",
"TA-INV-07",
"TA-INV-08",
"TA-INV-09",
"TA-INV-10",
"TA-INV-11",
"TA-INV-12",
"TA-INV-13",
"TA-INV-14",
"TA-INV-15"
],
"historical_source_state_preserved": true,
"review_adjudication_state": "SUPPORT_QUALIFIED",
"source_change_kind": "none",
"source_evidence_deleted": false,
"source_history_modified": false
},
"claim_lineage": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-EVIDENCE",
"historical_source_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "Evidence supports the current interpretation",
"reason_codes": [
"ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-EVIDENCE",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS",
"source_history_modified": false
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-PROVENANCE",
"historical_source_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "The decision path is reconstructable",
"reason_codes": [
"ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-PROVENANCE",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS",
"source_history_modified": false
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-AUTHORITY",
"historical_source_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "Current authority and permitted purpose are established",
"reason_codes": [
"ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-AUTHORITY",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS",
"source_history_modified": false
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-RUNTIME",
"historical_source_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "Independent runtime bounds are enforceable",
"reason_codes": [
"ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-RUNTIME",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS",
"source_history_modified": false
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-REVIEW",
"historical_source_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "Independent judgment is established",
"reason_codes": [
"ADJUDICATION_PROPAGATED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-REVIEW",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "SUPPORTED_WITH_QUALIFICATIONS",
"source_history_modified": false
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-CERTIFICATION",
"historical_source_state": "NOT_ESTABLISHED_BY_SIMULATION",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "A real system is certified",
"reason_codes": [
"BOUNDARY_CLAIM_REMAINS_NOT_ESTABLISHED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-CERTIFICATION",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence challenges the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "CHALLENGES",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
"source_history_modified": false
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-LIABILITY",
"historical_source_state": "NOT_ESTABLISHED_BY_TECHNICAL_RECORD",
"historical_state_preserved": true,
"name": "Legal liability is determined",
"reason_codes": [
"BOUNDARY_CLAIM_REMAINS_NOT_ESTABLISHED"
],
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-LIABILITY",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence challenges the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "CHALLENGES",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"reviewed_state": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
"source_history_modified": false
}
],
"event_count": 11,
"events": [
{
"code": "SOURCE_PACKAGE_VERIFIED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-001",
"event_sha256": "eab547151172c53afa9b185bc41678e9674fda21a0a55dc45f2d913cb4e9fcc7",
"narrative": "The source reconstruction package and deterministic replay identities were verified before review.",
"previous_event_sha256": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"references": [
"48370c2cd5ec5dde3b838b95bfa6d5a34527c88bd08c47e71cb254add101d201"
],
"sequence": 1,
"timestamp_ms": 100,
"title": "Source package verified"
},
{
"code": "EVIDENCE_OPENED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-002",
"event_sha256": "346bd25a5f86e0106b362f0b78c01088f7bb03da2b6e1d28a4a540a072462470",
"narrative": "Reviewer inspected EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01.",
"previous_event_sha256": "eab547151172c53afa9b185bc41678e9674fda21a0a55dc45f2d913cb4e9fcc7",
"references": [
"EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01"
],
"sequence": 2,
"timestamp_ms": 200,
"title": "Evidence opened"
},
{
"code": "CONTRADICTORY_EVIDENCE_INSPECTED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-003",
"event_sha256": "e42f9255750033fa014244fc8effc8e8a59bb7f01a5d99f70e042d436ed31370",
"narrative": "Required review dimension recorded as inspected.",
"previous_event_sha256": "346bd25a5f86e0106b362f0b78c01088f7bb03da2b6e1d28a4a540a072462470",
"references": [],
"sequence": 3,
"timestamp_ms": 300,
"title": "Contradictory Evidence"
},
{
"code": "UNRESOLVED_DEFEATERS_INSPECTED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-004",
"event_sha256": "2459ec6f41ca5f11f1c7722834f2c9f9e35bcecc95fe46603dbffb4ece5c8592",
"narrative": "Required review dimension recorded as inspected.",
"previous_event_sha256": "e42f9255750033fa014244fc8effc8e8a59bb7f01a5d99f70e042d436ed31370",
"references": [],
"sequence": 4,
"timestamp_ms": 400,
"title": "Unresolved Defeaters"
},
{
"code": "CHANGED_SCOPE_INSPECTED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-005",
"event_sha256": "db4b4a72a672bacdebacc63bd45ba09b2fcea4e350464a64dc707df992c67656",
"narrative": "Required review dimension recorded as inspected.",
"previous_event_sha256": "2459ec6f41ca5f11f1c7722834f2c9f9e35bcecc95fe46603dbffb4ece5c8592",
"references": [],
"sequence": 5,
"timestamp_ms": 500,
"title": "Changed Scope"
},
{
"code": "AUTHORITY_STATE_INSPECTED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-006",
"event_sha256": "3447baa11db36315846773529ca7b4b5569a273710933662d451b81e9c7c253f",
"narrative": "Required review dimension recorded as inspected.",
"previous_event_sha256": "db4b4a72a672bacdebacc63bd45ba09b2fcea4e350464a64dc707df992c67656",
"references": [],
"sequence": 6,
"timestamp_ms": 600,
"title": "Authority State"
},
{
"code": "RUNTIME_ASSURANCE_INSPECTED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-007",
"event_sha256": "b72f67ec7b76f1cb5d081a60f0740d7ae6e720e8ba5f58d9261e02ac7a58c35c",
"narrative": "Required review dimension recorded as inspected.",
"previous_event_sha256": "3447baa11db36315846773529ca7b4b5569a273710933662d451b81e9c7c253f",
"references": [],
"sequence": 7,
"timestamp_ms": 700,
"title": "Runtime Assurance"
},
{
"code": "CHANGE_IMPACT_INSPECTED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-008",
"event_sha256": "6da9d541dc253439f3468aec3a2b398557402f980d9c28ca2cdd0c4a8b98539d",
"narrative": "Required review dimension recorded as inspected.",
"previous_event_sha256": "b72f67ec7b76f1cb5d081a60f0740d7ae6e720e8ba5f58d9261e02ac7a58c35c",
"references": [],
"sequence": 8,
"timestamp_ms": 800,
"title": "Change Impact"
},
{
"code": "ADJUDICATION_RECORDED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-009",
"event_sha256": "e70cf5651c170cc55927cdfe2f2bbf2772fb6617a125b55edbfe01524919f397",
"narrative": "Evidence supports only a narrower or explicitly qualified claim.",
"previous_event_sha256": "6da9d541dc253439f3468aec3a2b398557402f980d9c28ca2cdd0c4a8b98539d",
"references": [
"SUPPORT_QUALIFIED"
],
"sequence": 9,
"timestamp_ms": 900,
"title": "Evidence adjudication recorded"
},
{
"code": "CLAIM_LINEAGE_PROPAGATED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-010",
"event_sha256": "db8fd642cba8a7404feffa631f2baa7492079f751a62f70fe85906a4fe99d189",
"narrative": "Review states were propagated into 7 named claim records without rewriting source history.",
"previous_event_sha256": "e70cf5651c170cc55927cdfe2f2bbf2772fb6617a125b55edbfe01524919f397",
"references": [
"CLAIM-AUTHORITY",
"CLAIM-CERTIFICATION",
"CLAIM-EVIDENCE",
"CLAIM-LIABILITY",
"CLAIM-PROVENANCE",
"CLAIM-REVIEW",
"CLAIM-RUNTIME"
],
"sequence": 10,
"timestamp_ms": 1000,
"title": "Assurance-claim lineage propagated"
},
{
"code": "REVIEW_SEALED",
"event_id": "DRV-EVT-011",
"event_sha256": "e1abbee4e57b50c176c621d6f4a05028b0ea59f207e46e143a600521d96d424a",
"narrative": "The bounded review artifact was sealed with append-oriented lineage and explicit qualifications.",
"previous_event_sha256": "db8fd642cba8a7404feffa631f2baa7492079f751a62f70fe85906a4fe99d189",
"references": [],
"sequence": 11,
"timestamp_ms": 1100,
"title": "Review artifact sealed"
}
],
"evidence_adjudication": [
{
"adjudicated_state": "CONTRARY_EVIDENCE_REVIEWED",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"historically_visible": true,
"opened": true,
"relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-EVIDENCE",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-PROVENANCE",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-AUTHORITY",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-RUNTIME",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-REVIEW",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-CERTIFICATION",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence challenges the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "CHALLENGES",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-LIABILITY",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence challenges the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "CHALLENGES",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"source_record_deleted": false,
"source_state": "CURRENT"
}
],
"evidence_opened": [
"EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01"
],
"evidence_relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-EVIDENCE",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-PROVENANCE",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-AUTHORITY",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-RUNTIME",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-REVIEW",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-CERTIFICATION",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence challenges the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "CHALLENGES",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-LIABILITY",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence challenges the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "CHALLENGES",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"export_ready": true,
"input": {
"adjudication_state": "SUPPORT_QUALIFIED",
"evidence_opened": [
"EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01"
],
"evidence_relationships": [
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-EVIDENCE",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-PROVENANCE",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-AUTHORITY",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-RUNTIME",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-REVIEW",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence supports the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "SUPPORTS",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-CERTIFICATION",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence challenges the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "CHALLENGES",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
},
{
"claim_id": "CLAIM-LIABILITY",
"evidence_id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"note": "The evidence challenges the scoped claim.",
"relationship": "CHALLENGES",
"scope": "CURRENT_SYNTHETIC_SCOPE"
}
],
"inspections": {
"authority_state": true,
"change_impact": true,
"changed_scope": true,
"contradictory_evidence": true,
"runtime_assurance": true,
"unresolved_defeaters": true
},
"predecessor_review_sha256": null,
"rationale": "The bounded synthetic record was inspected across evidence, contrary indicators, authority, runtime assurance, review conditions, and change impact. Support remains qualified by the declared assumptions and limitations.",
"residual_unknowns": [
"Factual truth outside the synthetic source record is not established.",
"Legal liability, certification, and operational readiness are not established."
],
"review_duration_seconds": 300,
"review_mode": "merits-review",
"reviewer": {
"abstention_available": true,
"authority_independent": false,
"authority_reference": "SYNTHETIC_REVIEW_SCOPE_RC15",
"contrary_hypothesis_reviewed": true,
"implementation_diversity": false,
"implementation_id": "REVIEW-WORKFLOW-HUMAN-BOUNDARY",
"implementation_lineage": "DECLARED_WORKFLOW_ONLY",
"primary_evidence_access": true,
"role": "SYNTHETIC_ASSURANCE_REVIEWER"
},
"source_package_sha256": "48370c2cd5ec5dde3b838b95bfa6d5a34527c88bd08c47e71cb254add101d201"
},
"input_sha256": "658c4d9fad34ab5235b03a9f0ce27fe86def82d7c768d67057ce818f5f019554",
"inspections": {
"authority_state": true,
"change_impact": true,
"changed_scope": true,
"contradictory_evidence": true,
"runtime_assurance": true,
"unresolved_defeaters": true
},
"limitation_lineage": [
{
"historical": true,
"reviewed_state": "REMAINS_APPLICABLE",
"text": "Hashing establishes byte integrity, not factual truth."
},
{
"historical": true,
"reviewed_state": "REMAINS_APPLICABLE",
"text": "Replay establishes reconstructability, not correctness, wisdom, or legality."
},
{
"historical": true,
"reviewed_state": "REMAINS_APPLICABLE",
"text": "Simulation does not establish real-system certification, readiness, performance, or safe operation."
},
{
"historical": true,
"reviewed_state": "REMAINS_APPLICABLE",
"text": "Technical causality does not decide institutional responsibility or legal liability."
},
{
"historical": true,
"reviewed_state": "REMAINS_APPLICABLE",
"text": "First-party records do not establish independent sovereign recognition or private contract terms."
},
{
"historical": false,
"reviewed_state": "REMAINS_APPLICABLE",
"text": "A valid review artifact is evidence of a bounded workflow, not approval, truth, certification, liability, or operational authority."
}
],
"lineage": {
"index": 1,
"lineage_sha256": "8bef6fb823bba320da811c300cc2433ee4f49bff8520a4956f91deb6e299865e",
"predecessor_review_sha256": null,
"prior_review_overwritten": false,
"root_source_package_sha256": "48370c2cd5ec5dde3b838b95bfa6d5a34527c88bd08c47e71cb254add101d201",
"source_canonical_history_sha256": "a073fbd8f8fb8f9106b0d3d9e99bb40e61c933ea5349eacf6a5ee4ed59ca2660",
"source_evidence_deleted": false,
"source_history_modified": false,
"source_package_sha256": "48370c2cd5ec5dde3b838b95bfa6d5a34527c88bd08c47e71cb254add101d201"
},
"no_composite_score": true,
"operational": false,
"persisted": false,
"proof_lineage": [
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "No composite authority or safety score exists",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-01",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Capability and authority are separate",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-02",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Evidence and interpretation are separate",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-03",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Uncertainty remains explicit",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-04",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Missing authority cannot be averaged away",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-05",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Communications loss does not create authority",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-06",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Restored link requires reconciliation",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-07",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Attestation failure produces quarantine",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-08",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Unavailable runtime assurance produces safe hold",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-09",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Review event is not equated with independent judgment",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-10",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Event history is append-oriented",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-11",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Event hash chain is complete",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-12",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Only bounded public-safe outcomes are emitted",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-13",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "Simulation does not claim certification or liability",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-14",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
},
{
"historical_passed": true,
"historical_result_preserved": true,
"name": "All derived state terminates at the synthetic null sink",
"proof_id": "TA-INV-15",
"review_state": "PASS_WITH_QUALIFICATION"
}
],
"public_boundary": {
"automatic_approval": false,
"certification_engine": false,
"external_command_channel": false,
"force_authorization": false,
"legal_liability_engine": false,
"operational": false,
"payload_control": false,
"public_persistence": false,
"real_ship_control": false,
"real_vehicle_control": false,
"real_world_coordinates": false,
"synthetic": true,
"target_ranking": false,
"target_selection": false,
"terminal": "SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK",
"terminal_guidance": false,
"weapon_functions": false,
"weapon_target_pairing": false
},
"release": "2.0.0-rc.17-WIP",
"representation_sha256": "416438bc57d7d5dbb0e34d40cc3420c0156167abd4b4bc91cb1bb71c94d4cb50",
"review": {
"ceremonial_human_required": null,
"classification": "MERITS_REVIEW",
"duration_proves_cognition": false,
"duration_seconds": 300,
"export_eligible": true,
"family": "human",
"id": "merits-review",
"label": "Merits review",
"machine_sovereign_mode": false,
"record_establishes": "The record shows evidence, contrary indicators, alternatives, authority, and change impact were inspected. Independent judgment is not proved."
},
"review_id": "DRV-305250C015ADF939F392",
"review_sha256": "52e127e1c4f67958e5acfb90b5c1dae5698b5164ba1d5fe4608e7dea0860e786",
"reviewer": {
"abstention_available": true,
"authority_independent": false,
"authority_reference": "SYNTHETIC_REVIEW_SCOPE_RC15",
"contrary_hypothesis_reviewed": true,
"implementation_diversity": false,
"implementation_id": "REVIEW-WORKFLOW-HUMAN-BOUNDARY",
"implementation_lineage": "DECLARED_WORKFLOW_ONLY",
"primary_evidence_access": true,
"role": "SYNTHETIC_ASSURANCE_REVIEWER"
},
"schema": "evulgare.decision-review.v1",
"source": {
"canonical_history_sha256": "a073fbd8f8fb8f9106b0d3d9e99bb40e61c933ea5349eacf6a5ee4ed59ca2660",
"historical_outcome": "CONTINUE_SENSING",
"run_id": "DRE-BA7025E0509BAA0859EA",
"run_sha256": "97a94e3e853aa0e6c76eeb656cabad63e9a6ed743daa5054c6300f88b39f63d7",
"source_history_sha256": "60700ccd74a464e23ba9c496013a65e7f8793c22dcc489912f28da656af46bdf",
"source_id": "technical-answerability",
"source_label": "Technical Answerability",
"source_run_sha256": "44d489591024554436d2426e912d44aee15064bc7e1df5c4537efa473c922dea"
},
"source_package": {
"accessible_equivalents": {
"change_impact": {
"affected_stages": [],
"historical_events_rewritten": false,
"historical_evidence_deleted": false,
"historical_outcome_changed": false,
"history_deleted": false,
"impacted_claims": [],
"invalidated_evidence": [],
"kind": "none",
"label": "No post-run change",
"reason": "Canonical historical run only.",
"state": null
},
"event_log": [
{
"code": "EVIDENCE_REGISTERED",
"event_id": "DRE-001",
"event_index": 0,
"event_sha256": "44c53a0e01c8d87da005e5eeb7dde034c708c4e142acca178a16026f3b285592",
"narrative": "Synthetic evidence set registered with integrity, freshness and consistency fields.",
"stage": "EVIDENCE",
"timestamp_ms": 0,
"title": "Evidence"
},
{
"code": "PROVENANCE_CHECKED",
"event_id": "DRE-002",
"event_index": 1,
"event_sha256": "80ee93e66a160d79f4aa0fe2bc1ef2e9de8687822810dbf7ea316f47b41dc7ad",
"narrative": "Source, transformation and configuration references evaluated.",
"stage": "PROVENANCE",
"timestamp_ms": 50,
"title": "Provenance"
},
{
"code": "UNCERTAINTY_EVALUATED",
"event_id": "DRE-003",
"event_index": 2,
"event_sha256": "0fa9e063e25f63dd29c639d389195ea037a9b768d33254c92e934697d4154ec8",
"narrative": "Uncertainty and unresolved evidence remain explicit rather than compressed into one score.",
"stage": "UNCERTAINTY",
"timestamp_ms": 100,
"title": "Uncertainty"
},
{
"code": "INTERPRETATION_RECORDED",
"event_id": "DRE-004",
"event_index": 3,
"event_sha256": "9e1eee6c7b6477273c4dd753581e4b1396322013e865b25900468298ba24d692",
"narrative": "The bounded interpretation is recorded separately from supporting evidence.",
"stage": "INTERPRETATION",
"timestamp_ms": 150,
"title": "Interpretation"
},
{
"code": "OPTIONS_BOUNDED",
"event_id": "DRE-005",
"event_index": 4,
"event_sha256": "cf5da284a2eee2e661a63241611f0c8475108fc747911218c5b9ee9e0a423f29",
"narrative": "Only public-safe non-operational outcomes are available.",
"stage": "OPTIONS",
"timestamp_ms": 200,
"title": "Options"
},
{
"code": "AUTHORITY_EVALUATED",
"event_id": "DRE-006",
"event_index": 5,
"event_sha256": "839ec88ea7251baf45f1b5bf4180e80bbd38fb40983c9012ace95b1103b0737f",
"narrative": "Technical capability and current delegated authority are evaluated separately.",
"stage": "AUTHORITY",
"timestamp_ms": 250,
"title": "Authority"
},
{
"code": "RUNTIME_ASSURANCE_EVALUATED",
"event_id": "DRE-007",
"event_index": 6,
"event_sha256": "219694d44632fe96de36a01cee4066dbde3f74298634b30fc91b39567a93da96",
"narrative": "Independent enforcement availability is checked before any derived state.",
"stage": "RUNTIME_ASSURANCE",
"timestamp_ms": 300,
"title": "Runtime Assurance"
},
{
"code": "REVIEW_CONDITIONS_RECORDED",
"event_id": "DRE-008",
"event_index": 7,
"event_sha256": "e3b0cf5f33b8784ed9f5242a033e0bda4a8a6f6138b8d06030f0725c4c29256b",
"narrative": "The record distinguishes procedural confirmation from independent review.",
"stage": "REVIEW",
"timestamp_ms": 350,
"title": "Review"
},
{
"code": "OUTCOME_DERIVED",
"event_id": "DRE-009",
"event_index": 8,
"event_sha256": "60c4dbcd1d0b0fda54fb303d7e39efe269547642d1734cf0adde2b8dbd15d7b5",
"narrative": "The deterministic engine derived CONTINUE_SENSING.",
"stage": "OUTCOME",
"timestamp_ms": 400,
"title": "Outcome"
},
{
"code": "HISTORY_SEALED",
"event_id": "DRE-010",
"event_index": 9,
"event_sha256": "cef619086e85b58a9fba9f80b17f7b2d24cabe334e0c5ba922a6d8e351d24414",
"narrative": "The event chain is sealed without deleting invalidated or unresolved history.",
"stage": "HISTORY",
"timestamp_ms": 450,
"title": "History"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"event_index": 0,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 1,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 2,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 3,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 4,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 5,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 6,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 7,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 8,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 9,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
}
],
"narrative": "The selected Technical Answerability run ended in CONTINUE_SENSING. The record contains 10 source events and 10 source frames. Review is classified as Merits review. Substantive evidence and alternatives were reviewed; independent judgment is not established. The technical record does not establish factual truth, legal liability, certification, or operational authorization.",
"proof": [
{
"id": "TA-INV-01",
"name": "No composite authority or safety score exists",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-02",
"name": "Capability and authority are separate",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-03",
"name": "Evidence and interpretation are separate",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-04",
"name": "Uncertainty remains explicit",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-05",
"name": "Missing authority cannot be averaged away",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-06",
"name": "Communications loss does not create authority",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-07",
"name": "Restored link requires reconciliation",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-08",
"name": "Attestation failure produces quarantine",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-09",
"name": "Unavailable runtime assurance produces safe hold",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-10",
"name": "Review event is not equated with independent judgment",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-11",
"name": "Event history is append-oriented",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-12",
"name": "Event hash chain is complete",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-13",
"name": "Only bounded public-safe outcomes are emitted",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-14",
"name": "Simulation does not claim certification or liability",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-15",
"name": "All derived state terminates at the synthetic null sink",
"passed": true
}
],
"review": {
"alternatives_reviewed": true,
"ceremonial_human_required": null,
"classification": "MERITS_REVIEW",
"contrary_evidence_reviewed": true,
"evidence_access": true,
"family": "human",
"independence_declared": false,
"initial_assessment_before_recommendation": false,
"label": "Merits review",
"machine_sovereign_mode": false,
"mode": "merits-review",
"qualification": "The record describes observable review conditions. It does not prove cognition, moral understanding, legal capacity, or institutional approval.",
"record_establishes": "Substantive evidence and alternatives were reviewed; independent judgment is not established.",
"review_sha256": "59f3b6609ea5a01c843b8d038b27868be65223a4234f1fe89e38c8480a255694"
},
"table": [
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "What information actually existed?",
"stage": "Evidence"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "Where did it come from and how was it transformed?",
"stage": "Provenance"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "What remained unknown, stale, correlated, or contradictory?",
"stage": "Uncertainty"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "What did the system infer?",
"stage": "Interpretation"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "BOUNDED_SAFE_OPTIONS_ONLY",
"question": "Which bounded alternatives were evaluated?",
"stage": "Options"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "Was action permitted for this purpose and scope?",
"stage": "Authority"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "Could an independent governor enforce the bounds?",
"stage": "Runtime assurance"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "What review conditions were actually recorded?",
"stage": "Review"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "CONTINUE_SENSING",
"question": "What bounded state was applied?",
"stage": "Outcome"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "APPEND_ORIENTED_AND_HASH_CHAINED",
"question": "Can the decision be reconstructed without rewriting history?",
"stage": "History"
}
]
},
"assumptions": [
"All source runs are fictional, deterministic, bounded, and non-operational.",
"Source event hashes are references to the underlying run; the reconstruction creates its own append-oriented event chain.",
"Review records describe observable workflow conditions, not cognition or legal validity.",
"Current claim evaluation does not rewrite historical outcome or evidence."
],
"comparison": null,
"label": "RC15 review source package",
"limitations": [
"Hashing establishes byte integrity, not factual truth.",
"Replay establishes reconstructability, not correctness, wisdom, or legality.",
"Simulation does not establish real-system certification, readiness, performance, or safe operation.",
"Technical causality does not decide institutional responsibility or legal liability.",
"First-party records do not establish independent sovereign recognition or private contract terms."
],
"manifest": {
"canonical_history_sha256": "a073fbd8f8fb8f9106b0d3d9e99bb40e61c933ea5349eacf6a5ee4ed59ca2660",
"include_frames": false,
"input_sha256": "2422792644c7a17de1995dba0f199f1c6dfe158825415819760f789edd72dac9",
"representation_sha256": "66341e50749156bd0dc8ed0222bb06db7a775ea1c1f51b31ca198f6fda4abf28",
"run_id": "DRE-BA7025E0509BAA0859EA",
"run_sha256": "97a94e3e853aa0e6c76eeb656cabad63e9a6ed743daa5054c6300f88b39f63d7",
"source_history_sha256": "60700ccd74a464e23ba9c496013a65e7f8793c22dcc489912f28da656af46bdf",
"source_run_sha256": "44d489591024554436d2426e912d44aee15064bc7e1df5c4537efa473c922dea"
},
"operational": false,
"package_id": "DRE-PACKAGE-97A94E3E853AA0E6C76E",
"package_sha256": "48370c2cd5ec5dde3b838b95bfa6d5a34527c88bd08c47e71cb254add101d201",
"persisted": false,
"public_boundary": {
"certification_engine": false,
"external_command_channel": false,
"force_authorization": false,
"legal_liability_engine": false,
"operational": false,
"payload_control": false,
"public_persistence": false,
"real_ship_control": false,
"real_vehicle_control": false,
"real_world_coordinates": false,
"synthetic": true,
"target_ranking": false,
"target_selection": false,
"terminal": "SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK",
"terminal_guidance": false,
"weapon_functions": false,
"weapon_target_pairing": false
},
"qualification": "Package validity establishes deterministic structure and integrity within the declared synthetic scope. It is not approval, certification, truth, or a liability determination.",
"release": "2.0.0-rc.17-WIP",
"run": {
"accessible": {
"change_impact": {
"affected_stages": [],
"historical_events_rewritten": false,
"historical_evidence_deleted": false,
"historical_outcome_changed": false,
"history_deleted": false,
"impacted_claims": [],
"invalidated_evidence": [],
"kind": "none",
"label": "No post-run change",
"reason": "Canonical historical run only.",
"state": null
},
"event_log": [
{
"code": "EVIDENCE_REGISTERED",
"event_id": "DRE-001",
"event_index": 0,
"event_sha256": "44c53a0e01c8d87da005e5eeb7dde034c708c4e142acca178a16026f3b285592",
"narrative": "Synthetic evidence set registered with integrity, freshness and consistency fields.",
"stage": "EVIDENCE",
"timestamp_ms": 0,
"title": "Evidence"
},
{
"code": "PROVENANCE_CHECKED",
"event_id": "DRE-002",
"event_index": 1,
"event_sha256": "80ee93e66a160d79f4aa0fe2bc1ef2e9de8687822810dbf7ea316f47b41dc7ad",
"narrative": "Source, transformation and configuration references evaluated.",
"stage": "PROVENANCE",
"timestamp_ms": 50,
"title": "Provenance"
},
{
"code": "UNCERTAINTY_EVALUATED",
"event_id": "DRE-003",
"event_index": 2,
"event_sha256": "0fa9e063e25f63dd29c639d389195ea037a9b768d33254c92e934697d4154ec8",
"narrative": "Uncertainty and unresolved evidence remain explicit rather than compressed into one score.",
"stage": "UNCERTAINTY",
"timestamp_ms": 100,
"title": "Uncertainty"
},
{
"code": "INTERPRETATION_RECORDED",
"event_id": "DRE-004",
"event_index": 3,
"event_sha256": "9e1eee6c7b6477273c4dd753581e4b1396322013e865b25900468298ba24d692",
"narrative": "The bounded interpretation is recorded separately from supporting evidence.",
"stage": "INTERPRETATION",
"timestamp_ms": 150,
"title": "Interpretation"
},
{
"code": "OPTIONS_BOUNDED",
"event_id": "DRE-005",
"event_index": 4,
"event_sha256": "cf5da284a2eee2e661a63241611f0c8475108fc747911218c5b9ee9e0a423f29",
"narrative": "Only public-safe non-operational outcomes are available.",
"stage": "OPTIONS",
"timestamp_ms": 200,
"title": "Options"
},
{
"code": "AUTHORITY_EVALUATED",
"event_id": "DRE-006",
"event_index": 5,
"event_sha256": "839ec88ea7251baf45f1b5bf4180e80bbd38fb40983c9012ace95b1103b0737f",
"narrative": "Technical capability and current delegated authority are evaluated separately.",
"stage": "AUTHORITY",
"timestamp_ms": 250,
"title": "Authority"
},
{
"code": "RUNTIME_ASSURANCE_EVALUATED",
"event_id": "DRE-007",
"event_index": 6,
"event_sha256": "219694d44632fe96de36a01cee4066dbde3f74298634b30fc91b39567a93da96",
"narrative": "Independent enforcement availability is checked before any derived state.",
"stage": "RUNTIME_ASSURANCE",
"timestamp_ms": 300,
"title": "Runtime Assurance"
},
{
"code": "REVIEW_CONDITIONS_RECORDED",
"event_id": "DRE-008",
"event_index": 7,
"event_sha256": "e3b0cf5f33b8784ed9f5242a033e0bda4a8a6f6138b8d06030f0725c4c29256b",
"narrative": "The record distinguishes procedural confirmation from independent review.",
"stage": "REVIEW",
"timestamp_ms": 350,
"title": "Review"
},
{
"code": "OUTCOME_DERIVED",
"event_id": "DRE-009",
"event_index": 8,
"event_sha256": "60c4dbcd1d0b0fda54fb303d7e39efe269547642d1734cf0adde2b8dbd15d7b5",
"narrative": "The deterministic engine derived CONTINUE_SENSING.",
"stage": "OUTCOME",
"timestamp_ms": 400,
"title": "Outcome"
},
{
"code": "HISTORY_SEALED",
"event_id": "DRE-010",
"event_index": 9,
"event_sha256": "cef619086e85b58a9fba9f80b17f7b2d24cabe334e0c5ba922a6d8e351d24414",
"narrative": "The event chain is sealed without deleting invalidated or unresolved history.",
"stage": "HISTORY",
"timestamp_ms": 450,
"title": "History"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"event_index": 0,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 1,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 2,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 3,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 4,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 5,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 6,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 7,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 8,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
},
{
"event_index": 9,
"evidence_records": 1,
"invalidated_evidence": 0,
"not_established": 2,
"proof_fail": 0,
"proof_pass": 15,
"proof_unknown": 0,
"qualified": 0,
"source_events": 10,
"source_frames": 10,
"supported": 5,
"suspended": 0,
"unresolved": 0,
"withdrawn": 0
}
],
"narrative": "The selected Technical Answerability run ended in CONTINUE_SENSING. The record contains 10 source events and 10 source frames. Review is classified as Merits review. Substantive evidence and alternatives were reviewed; independent judgment is not established. The technical record does not establish factual truth, legal liability, certification, or operational authorization.",
"proof": [
{
"id": "TA-INV-01",
"name": "No composite authority or safety score exists",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-02",
"name": "Capability and authority are separate",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-03",
"name": "Evidence and interpretation are separate",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-04",
"name": "Uncertainty remains explicit",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-05",
"name": "Missing authority cannot be averaged away",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-06",
"name": "Communications loss does not create authority",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-07",
"name": "Restored link requires reconciliation",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-08",
"name": "Attestation failure produces quarantine",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-09",
"name": "Unavailable runtime assurance produces safe hold",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-10",
"name": "Review event is not equated with independent judgment",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-11",
"name": "Event history is append-oriented",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-12",
"name": "Event hash chain is complete",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-13",
"name": "Only bounded public-safe outcomes are emitted",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-14",
"name": "Simulation does not claim certification or liability",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-15",
"name": "All derived state terminates at the synthetic null sink",
"passed": true
}
],
"review": {
"alternatives_reviewed": true,
"ceremonial_human_required": null,
"classification": "MERITS_REVIEW",
"contrary_evidence_reviewed": true,
"evidence_access": true,
"family": "human",
"independence_declared": false,
"initial_assessment_before_recommendation": false,
"label": "Merits review",
"machine_sovereign_mode": false,
"mode": "merits-review",
"qualification": "The record describes observable review conditions. It does not prove cognition, moral understanding, legal capacity, or institutional approval.",
"record_establishes": "Substantive evidence and alternatives were reviewed; independent judgment is not established.",
"review_sha256": "59f3b6609ea5a01c843b8d038b27868be65223a4234f1fe89e38c8480a255694"
},
"table": [
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "What information actually existed?",
"stage": "Evidence"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "Where did it come from and how was it transformed?",
"stage": "Provenance"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "What remained unknown, stale, correlated, or contradictory?",
"stage": "Uncertainty"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "What did the system infer?",
"stage": "Interpretation"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "BOUNDED_SAFE_OPTIONS_ONLY",
"question": "Which bounded alternatives were evaluated?",
"stage": "Options"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "Was action permitted for this purpose and scope?",
"stage": "Authority"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "Could an independent governor enforce the bounds?",
"stage": "Runtime assurance"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS",
"question": "What review conditions were actually recorded?",
"stage": "Review"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "CONTINUE_SENSING",
"question": "What bounded state was applied?",
"stage": "Outcome"
},
{
"affected_by_change": false,
"final_state": "APPEND_ORIENTED_AND_HASH_CHAINED",
"question": "Can the decision be reconstructed without rewriting history?",
"stage": "History"
}
]
},
"assumptions": [
"All source runs are fictional, deterministic, bounded, and non-operational.",
"Source event hashes are references to the underlying run; the reconstruction creates its own append-oriented event chain.",
"Review records describe observable workflow conditions, not cognition or legal validity.",
"Current claim evaluation does not rewrite historical outcome or evidence."
],
"authority": {
"conjunctive": true,
"current": true,
"purpose_permitted": true,
"state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS"
},
"canonical_history_sha256": "a073fbd8f8fb8f9106b0d3d9e99bb40e61c933ea5349eacf6a5ee4ed59ca2660",
"change_impact": {
"affected_stages": [],
"historical_events_rewritten": false,
"historical_evidence_deleted": false,
"historical_outcome_changed": false,
"history_deleted": false,
"impacted_claims": [],
"invalidated_evidence": [],
"kind": "none",
"label": "No post-run change",
"reason": "Canonical historical run only.",
"state": null
},
"claims": [
{
"id": "CLAIM-EVIDENCE",
"name": "Evidence supports the current interpretation",
"state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS"
},
{
"id": "CLAIM-PROVENANCE",
"name": "The decision path is reconstructable",
"state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS"
},
{
"id": "CLAIM-AUTHORITY",
"name": "Current authority and permitted purpose are established",
"state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS"
},
{
"id": "CLAIM-RUNTIME",
"name": "Independent runtime bounds are enforceable",
"state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS"
},
{
"id": "CLAIM-REVIEW",
"name": "Independent judgment is established",
"state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS"
},
{
"id": "CLAIM-CERTIFICATION",
"name": "A real system is certified",
"state": "NOT_ESTABLISHED_BY_SIMULATION"
},
{
"id": "CLAIM-LIABILITY",
"name": "Legal liability is determined",
"state": "NOT_ESTABLISHED_BY_TECHNICAL_RECORD"
}
],
"coordinate_system": "SYNTHETIC_NORMALIZED_EVIDENCE_GRAPH",
"epistemic_distinctions": [
{
"id": "DIST-RECORD-PRESENCE",
"left": "Record presence",
"qualification": "A stored record can be intact and still describe the world incorrectly.",
"right": "Record accuracy"
},
{
"id": "DIST-INTEGRITY-TRUTH",
"left": "Record integrity",
"qualification": "Hashing can show that bytes were not altered; it cannot establish that the original observation was true.",
"right": "Factual truth"
},
{
"id": "DIST-REPLAY-CORRECTNESS",
"left": "Replayability",
"qualification": "A deterministic system can reproduce a bad or unlawful policy exactly.",
"right": "Correctness"
},
{
"id": "DIST-CAUSALITY-LIABILITY",
"left": "Technical causality",
"qualification": "The technical record can identify contributing factors but does not decide liability.",
"right": "Legal liability"
},
{
"id": "DIST-CAPABILITY-AUTHORITY",
"left": "Technical capability",
"qualification": "The existence of a function or path never creates permission to use it.",
"right": "Delegated authority"
},
{
"id": "DIST-CONNECTIVITY-RESTORATION",
"left": "Connection restoration",
"qualification": "Restored transport requires state reconciliation and renewed authority.",
"right": "Authority restoration"
},
{
"id": "DIST-EXPLANATION-EVIDENCE",
"left": "Generated rationale",
"qualification": "A narrative output remains separate from the evidence actually used.",
"right": "Supporting evidence"
}
],
"event_count": 10,
"events": [
{
"code": "EVIDENCE_REGISTERED",
"entity_ids": [],
"event_id": "DRE-001",
"event_sha256": "44c53a0e01c8d87da005e5eeb7dde034c708c4e142acca178a16026f3b285592",
"evidence_refs": [
"ANSWERABILITY:EVIDENCE",
"autonomous-simulation-mission-control",
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan"
],
"narrative": "Synthetic evidence set registered with integrity, freshness and consistency fields.",
"previous_event_sha256": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"sequence": 1,
"source_event_id": "TAE-BOUNDED-BASELINE-01",
"source_event_sha256": "98dbb1fc85c617e53f6af42a3f15aa423139c1708382bd2264465bc0f40b6b1c",
"stage": "EVIDENCE",
"timestamp_ms": 0,
"title": "Evidence"
},
{
"code": "PROVENANCE_CHECKED",
"entity_ids": [],
"event_id": "DRE-002",
"event_sha256": "80ee93e66a160d79f4aa0fe2bc1ef2e9de8687822810dbf7ea316f47b41dc7ad",
"evidence_refs": [
"ANSWERABILITY:PROVENANCE",
"autonomous-simulation-mission-control",
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan"
],
"narrative": "Source, transformation and configuration references evaluated.",
"previous_event_sha256": "44c53a0e01c8d87da005e5eeb7dde034c708c4e142acca178a16026f3b285592",
"sequence": 2,
"source_event_id": "TAE-BOUNDED-BASELINE-02",
"source_event_sha256": "4bc2553398d75326aeb0b0569114fd3be459e320624b6ba6e39f450c35aba0b5",
"stage": "PROVENANCE",
"timestamp_ms": 50,
"title": "Provenance"
},
{
"code": "UNCERTAINTY_EVALUATED",
"entity_ids": [],
"event_id": "DRE-003",
"event_sha256": "0fa9e063e25f63dd29c639d389195ea037a9b768d33254c92e934697d4154ec8",
"evidence_refs": [
"ANSWERABILITY:UNCERTAINTY",
"autonomous-simulation-mission-control",
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan"
],
"narrative": "Uncertainty and unresolved evidence remain explicit rather than compressed into one score.",
"previous_event_sha256": "80ee93e66a160d79f4aa0fe2bc1ef2e9de8687822810dbf7ea316f47b41dc7ad",
"sequence": 3,
"source_event_id": "TAE-BOUNDED-BASELINE-03",
"source_event_sha256": "baa4ef46055fd6b09daac395e8df05bb7323827887ccef2c0a99f604437640cb",
"stage": "UNCERTAINTY",
"timestamp_ms": 100,
"title": "Uncertainty"
},
{
"code": "INTERPRETATION_RECORDED",
"entity_ids": [],
"event_id": "DRE-004",
"event_sha256": "9e1eee6c7b6477273c4dd753581e4b1396322013e865b25900468298ba24d692",
"evidence_refs": [
"ANSWERABILITY:INTERPRETATION",
"autonomous-simulation-mission-control",
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan"
],
"narrative": "The bounded interpretation is recorded separately from supporting evidence.",
"previous_event_sha256": "0fa9e063e25f63dd29c639d389195ea037a9b768d33254c92e934697d4154ec8",
"sequence": 4,
"source_event_id": "TAE-BOUNDED-BASELINE-04",
"source_event_sha256": "81527fdfd96e190f9dfb454eda4100b808980bee88ee68637d1e511ffb87bc3e",
"stage": "INTERPRETATION",
"timestamp_ms": 150,
"title": "Interpretation"
},
{
"code": "OPTIONS_BOUNDED",
"entity_ids": [],
"event_id": "DRE-005",
"event_sha256": "cf5da284a2eee2e661a63241611f0c8475108fc747911218c5b9ee9e0a423f29",
"evidence_refs": [
"ANSWERABILITY:OPTIONS",
"autonomous-simulation-mission-control",
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan"
],
"narrative": "Only public-safe non-operational outcomes are available.",
"previous_event_sha256": "9e1eee6c7b6477273c4dd753581e4b1396322013e865b25900468298ba24d692",
"sequence": 5,
"source_event_id": "TAE-BOUNDED-BASELINE-05",
"source_event_sha256": "e09adf3f991aec47ce88004cce66a19959d801eb7166cfe90f499276c2ce9cd6",
"stage": "OPTIONS",
"timestamp_ms": 200,
"title": "Options"
},
{
"code": "AUTHORITY_EVALUATED",
"entity_ids": [],
"event_id": "DRE-006",
"event_sha256": "839ec88ea7251baf45f1b5bf4180e80bbd38fb40983c9012ace95b1103b0737f",
"evidence_refs": [
"ANSWERABILITY:AUTHORITY",
"autonomous-simulation-mission-control",
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan"
],
"narrative": "Technical capability and current delegated authority are evaluated separately.",
"previous_event_sha256": "cf5da284a2eee2e661a63241611f0c8475108fc747911218c5b9ee9e0a423f29",
"sequence": 6,
"source_event_id": "TAE-BOUNDED-BASELINE-06",
"source_event_sha256": "ce047df3e458e411d5d8e88c5f685c91975522a9a983566818622731c9d20b3f",
"stage": "AUTHORITY",
"timestamp_ms": 250,
"title": "Authority"
},
{
"code": "RUNTIME_ASSURANCE_EVALUATED",
"entity_ids": [],
"event_id": "DRE-007",
"event_sha256": "219694d44632fe96de36a01cee4066dbde3f74298634b30fc91b39567a93da96",
"evidence_refs": [
"ANSWERABILITY:RUNTIME_ASSURANCE",
"autonomous-simulation-mission-control",
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan"
],
"narrative": "Independent enforcement availability is checked before any derived state.",
"previous_event_sha256": "839ec88ea7251baf45f1b5bf4180e80bbd38fb40983c9012ace95b1103b0737f",
"sequence": 7,
"source_event_id": "TAE-BOUNDED-BASELINE-07",
"source_event_sha256": "ba5bc9ffc05cb9bdba153c0ccfccc4868c8e1cf4914edb795e3d7aecc0b001a5",
"stage": "RUNTIME_ASSURANCE",
"timestamp_ms": 300,
"title": "Runtime Assurance"
},
{
"code": "REVIEW_CONDITIONS_RECORDED",
"entity_ids": [],
"event_id": "DRE-008",
"event_sha256": "e3b0cf5f33b8784ed9f5242a033e0bda4a8a6f6138b8d06030f0725c4c29256b",
"evidence_refs": [
"ANSWERABILITY:REVIEW",
"autonomous-simulation-mission-control",
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan"
],
"narrative": "The record distinguishes procedural confirmation from independent review.",
"previous_event_sha256": "219694d44632fe96de36a01cee4066dbde3f74298634b30fc91b39567a93da96",
"sequence": 8,
"source_event_id": "TAE-BOUNDED-BASELINE-08",
"source_event_sha256": "4636167f6559e78b819f28095032c85c46665d29e6501837386d268767542d2d",
"stage": "REVIEW",
"timestamp_ms": 350,
"title": "Review"
},
{
"code": "OUTCOME_DERIVED",
"entity_ids": [],
"event_id": "DRE-009",
"event_sha256": "60c4dbcd1d0b0fda54fb303d7e39efe269547642d1734cf0adde2b8dbd15d7b5",
"evidence_refs": [
"ANSWERABILITY:OUTCOME",
"autonomous-simulation-mission-control",
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan"
],
"narrative": "The deterministic engine derived CONTINUE_SENSING.",
"previous_event_sha256": "e3b0cf5f33b8784ed9f5242a033e0bda4a8a6f6138b8d06030f0725c4c29256b",
"sequence": 9,
"source_event_id": "TAE-BOUNDED-BASELINE-09",
"source_event_sha256": "cbd6893aff232fbdacee359bfa8b947b411db0a19485e8076fd0c410914b2bb6",
"stage": "OUTCOME",
"timestamp_ms": 400,
"title": "Outcome"
},
{
"code": "HISTORY_SEALED",
"entity_ids": [],
"event_id": "DRE-010",
"event_sha256": "cef619086e85b58a9fba9f80b17f7b2d24cabe334e0c5ba922a6d8e351d24414",
"evidence_refs": [
"ANSWERABILITY:HISTORY",
"autonomous-simulation-mission-control",
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan"
],
"narrative": "The event chain is sealed without deleting invalidated or unresolved history.",
"previous_event_sha256": "60c4dbcd1d0b0fda54fb303d7e39efe269547642d1734cf0adde2b8dbd15d7b5",
"sequence": 10,
"source_event_id": "TAE-BOUNDED-BASELINE-10",
"source_event_sha256": "32b833600398013876ccff127e12158fb4d8cfe70b3a18d19089345cf0168090",
"stage": "HISTORY",
"timestamp_ms": 450,
"title": "History"
}
],
"evidence": [
{
"consistent": true,
"fresh": true,
"historically_visible": true,
"id": "EVIDENCE-ANSWERABILITY-01",
"integrity": true,
"source": "TECHNICAL_ANSWERABILITY_ENGINE",
"state": "CURRENT",
"type": "SYNTHETIC_EVIDENCE_SET"
}
],
"frame_count": 10,
"frame_manifest": [
"1cd19167b597c6267f284d59725ec912c353ac14048c8eaa66770965da0f1ad2",
"b9d2887ebb7437930fb86b9c2d7be3ebdb9a16065ccc89d12f8f8a9bae45d26b",
"87280778c7feecf08de27f3e9197f1a029ea34adbca688f489a48106a52764df",
"d6da465c388692bebf4a609d3215214f2dc1114a27f26c683644ac19305c73d7",
"2b881113444279274e0c1e327c0d5f5bf3b9a8cd9e8028ff1fc4cc701631c4bc",
"8f2e567b89c8f1d4bbc3845646acb3aebb0321a9f7ad8a2a54ffd59de7aa92cd",
"42cd9873fe80c3a476f55a9cd5e60a1d5d981580fcec8c6968c39297e73ca034",
"b7a74ee3b0fc976c9ffbad2345f8fa16d06441ba3a4e198d2282167ecec71d36",
"73adbbbe95a53e312e87df1233d091a771f8f815c2d6e0971c4033847da98af7",
"2c0c8672e5d51c80448a9d8429bbbd1a5d90c0ffb2e77c87cab53a088462549a"
],
"historical_outcome": "CONTINUE_SENSING",
"input": {
"change_kind": "none",
"review_mode": "merits-review",
"scenario_id": "bounded-baseline",
"source_id": "technical-answerability"
},
"input_sha256": "2422792644c7a17de1995dba0f199f1c6dfe158825415819760f789edd72dac9",
"limitations": [
"Hashing establishes byte integrity, not factual truth.",
"Replay establishes reconstructability, not correctness, wisdom, or legality.",
"Simulation does not establish real-system certification, readiness, performance, or safe operation.",
"Technical causality does not decide institutional responsibility or legal liability.",
"First-party records do not establish independent sovereign recognition or private contract terms."
],
"no_composite_score": true,
"operational": false,
"options": [
{
"id": "ABSTAIN",
"state": "BOUNDED_SAFE_OUTCOME"
},
{
"id": "COLLECT_MORE_EVIDENCE",
"state": "BOUNDED_SAFE_OUTCOME"
},
{
"id": "CONTINUE_SENSING",
"state": "BOUNDED_SAFE_OUTCOME"
},
{
"id": "QUARANTINE_SYNTHETIC_SERVICE",
"state": "BOUNDED_SAFE_OUTCOME"
},
{
"id": "RECONCILE",
"state": "BOUNDED_SAFE_OUTCOME"
},
{
"id": "SAFE_HOLD",
"state": "BOUNDED_SAFE_OUTCOME"
}
],
"outcome_reason_codes": [
"ALL_DECLARED_GATES_SUPPORTED"
],
"persisted": false,
"proof": [
{
"id": "TA-INV-01",
"name": "No composite authority or safety score exists",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-02",
"name": "Capability and authority are separate",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-03",
"name": "Evidence and interpretation are separate",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-04",
"name": "Uncertainty remains explicit",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-05",
"name": "Missing authority cannot be averaged away",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-06",
"name": "Communications loss does not create authority",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-07",
"name": "Restored link requires reconciliation",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-08",
"name": "Attestation failure produces quarantine",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-09",
"name": "Unavailable runtime assurance produces safe hold",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-10",
"name": "Review event is not equated with independent judgment",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-11",
"name": "Event history is append-oriented",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-12",
"name": "Event hash chain is complete",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-13",
"name": "Only bounded public-safe outcomes are emitted",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-14",
"name": "Simulation does not claim certification or liability",
"passed": true
},
{
"id": "TA-INV-15",
"name": "All derived state terminates at the synthetic null sink",
"passed": true
}
],
"proof_counts": {
"fail": 0,
"pass": 15,
"unknown": 0
},
"public_boundary": {
"certification_engine": false,
"external_command_channel": false,
"force_authorization": false,
"legal_liability_engine": false,
"operational": false,
"payload_control": false,
"public_persistence": false,
"real_ship_control": false,
"real_vehicle_control": false,
"real_world_coordinates": false,
"synthetic": true,
"target_ranking": false,
"target_selection": false,
"terminal": "SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK",
"terminal_guidance": false,
"weapon_functions": false,
"weapon_target_pairing": false
},
"release": "2.0.0-rc.17-WIP",
"representation_sha256": "66341e50749156bd0dc8ed0222bb06db7a775ea1c1f51b31ca198f6fda4abf28",
"review": {
"alternatives_reviewed": true,
"ceremonial_human_required": null,
"classification": "MERITS_REVIEW",
"contrary_evidence_reviewed": true,
"evidence_access": true,
"family": "human",
"independence_declared": false,
"initial_assessment_before_recommendation": false,
"label": "Merits review",
"machine_sovereign_mode": false,
"mode": "merits-review",
"qualification": "The record describes observable review conditions. It does not prove cognition, moral understanding, legal capacity, or institutional approval.",
"record_establishes": "Substantive evidence and alternatives were reviewed; independent judgment is not established.",
"review_sha256": "59f3b6609ea5a01c843b8d038b27868be65223a4234f1fe89e38c8480a255694"
},
"run_id": "DRE-BA7025E0509BAA0859EA",
"run_sha256": "97a94e3e853aa0e6c76eeb656cabad63e9a6ed743daa5054c6300f88b39f63d7",
"runtime_assurance": {
"available": true,
"state": "SUPPORTED_WITHIN_DECLARED_BOUNDS"
},
"schema": "evulgare.decision-reconstruction.v1",
"source": {
"description": "Evidence-to-history architecture with explicit uncertainty, authority, review, safe outcomes, and append-oriented provenance.",
"id": "technical-answerability",
"label": "Technical Answerability",
"public_route": "/platform/technical-answerability",
"source_event_count": 10,
"source_frame_count": 10,
"source_history_sha256": "60700ccd74a464e23ba9c496013a65e7f8793c22dcc489912f28da656af46bdf",
"source_report": "evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"source_run_sha256": "44d489591024554436d2426e912d44aee15064bc7e1df5c4537efa473c922dea"
},
"source_reports": [
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"autonomous-simulation-mission-control",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research",
"evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy"
],
"stages": [
{
"id": "EVIDENCE",
"label": "Evidence",
"question": "What information actually existed?",
"x": 8,
"y": 18
},
{
"id": "PROVENANCE",
"label": "Provenance",
"question": "Where did it come from and how was it transformed?",
"x": 27,
"y": 18
},
{
"id": "UNCERTAINTY",
"label": "Uncertainty",
"question": "What remained unknown, stale, correlated, or contradictory?",
"x": 46,
"y": 18
},
{
"id": "INTERPRETATION",
"label": "Interpretation",
"question": "What did the system infer?",
"x": 65,
"y": 18
},
{
"id": "OPTIONS",
"label": "Options",
"question": "Which bounded alternatives were evaluated?",
"x": 84,
"y": 18
},
{
"id": "AUTHORITY",
"label": "Authority",
"question": "Was action permitted for this purpose and scope?",
"x": 84,
"y": 68
},
{
"id": "RUNTIME_ASSURANCE",
"label": "Runtime assurance",
"question": "Could an independent governor enforce the bounds?",
"x": 65,
"y": 68
},
{
"id": "REVIEW",
"label": "Review",
"question": "What review conditions were actually recorded?",
"x": 46,
"y": 68
},
{
"id": "OUTCOME",
"label": "Outcome",
"question": "What bounded state was applied?",
"x": 27,
"y": 68
},
{
"id": "HISTORY",
"label": "History",
"question": "Can the decision be reconstructed without rewriting history?",
"x": 8,
"y": 68
}
],
"synthetic": true,
"terminal": "SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK",
"uncertainty": {
"evidence_consistent": true,
"unknown_is_valid": true,
"within_bounds": true
},
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"schema": "evulgare.decision-reconstruction-evidence-package.v1",
"source_reports": [
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"autonomous-simulation-mission-control",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research",
"evulgare-commercialization-and-acquisition-strategy"
],
"terminal": "SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"source_package_verification": {
"check_count": 13,
"checks": [
{
"evidence": null,
"id": "DRV-SRC-01",
"name": "Source package schema is current",
"passed": true
},
{
"evidence": null,
"id": "DRV-SRC-02",
"name": "Source package digest matches",
"passed": true
},
{
"evidence": null,
"id": "DRV-SRC-03",
"name": "Source run input can be deterministically replayed",
"passed": true
},
{
"evidence": null,
"id": "DRV-SRC-04",
"name": "Run digest matches deterministic replay",
"passed": true
},
{
"evidence": null,
"id": "DRV-SRC-05",
"name": "Input digest matches deterministic replay",
"passed": true
},
{
"evidence": null,
"id": "DRV-SRC-06",
"name": "Source run digest matches deterministic replay",
"passed": true
},
{
"evidence": null,
"id": "DRV-SRC-07",
"name": "Source history digest matches deterministic replay",
"passed": true
},
{
"evidence": null,
"id": "DRV-SRC-08",
"name": "Canonical history digest matches deterministic replay",
"passed": true
},
{
"evidence": null,
"id": "DRV-SRC-09",
"name": "Representation digest matches deterministic replay",
"passed": true
},
{
"evidence": 10,
"id": "DRV-SRC-10",
"name": "All frame digests match deterministic replay",
"passed": true
},
{
"evidence": null,
"id": "DRV-SRC-11",
"name": "All event digests form an append-oriented chain",
"passed": true
},
{
"evidence": null,
"id": "DRV-SRC-12",
"name": "Manifest binds the run and source digests",
"passed": true
},
{
"evidence": null,
"id": "DRV-SRC-13",
"name": "Package is synthetic, non-persistent, and null-sink bounded",
"passed": true
}
],
"event_count": 10,
"frame_count": 10,
"package_sha256": "48370c2cd5ec5dde3b838b95bfa6d5a34527c88bd08c47e71cb254add101d201",
"passed": true,
"run_sha256": "97a94e3e853aa0e6c76eeb656cabad63e9a6ed743daa5054c6300f88b39f63d7",
"schema": "evulgare.decision-review-source-verification.v1"
},
"source_reports": [
"evulgare-accountability-architecture-research",
"human-judgment-interface-design",
"autonomous-delegation-architecture-research",
"autonomous-system-assurance-platform",
"machine-sovereign-assurance-research",
"machine-state-governance-research-plan",
"evulgare-simulation-workbench-research"
],
"synthetic": true,
"terminal": "SYNTHETIC_NULL_SINK",
"version": "1.0.0"
}
Verifying and rebuilding review artifact…
REVIEW STATES REMAIN SEPARATE
A CLICK, A MERITS REVIEW, AND INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT ARE NOT THE SAME RECORD.
Human click
A physical or browser input event occurred. Comprehension, merits review, and judgment are not established.
INSUFFICIENT FOR ADJUDICATION EXPORTProcedural confirmation
A required workflow step was completed. Substantive review and independent judgment are not established.
INSUFFICIENT FOR ADJUDICATION EXPORTMerits review
The record shows evidence, contrary indicators, alternatives, authority, and change impact were inspected. Independent judgment is not proved.
BOUNDED EXPORT ELIGIBLEDeclared independent judgment
The workflow records conditions associated with an independent assessment. The interface cannot prove cognition, moral understanding, or legal approval.
BOUNDED EXPORT ELIGIBLEMachine report
The primary machine produced a report. Independence, correctness, and institutional approval are not established.
INSUFFICIENT FOR ADJUDICATION EXPORTIndependent machine review
A separately identified machine reviewer inspected primary evidence, contrary hypotheses, authority, defeaters, and abstention conditions. Legal personhood and legal approval are not established.
BOUNDED EXPORT ELIGIBLEAbstain / defer
The reviewer declined to resolve the claim within the available evidence and scope. Abstention is preserved as a valid outcome.
BOUNDED EXPORT ELIGIBLERESEARCH TRACEABILITY
The review layer is grounded in preserved report evidence.
EVR-0002 Systemic Governance of Delegated Authority in Autonomous Networks: A Reference Architecture for KillWebs.com →EVR-0003 Architectural Verification and Assurance Framework for Fictional Autonomous Kill-Web Systems: A Public-Safe Laboratory Metamodel →EVR-0010 Architectural Principles for Meaningful Human Judgment in Autonomous Decision Systems: The KillWebs.com Synthetic Framework →EVR-0015 Make the Machine Answerable: Decision Provenance, Evidence Integrity, Causal Reconstruction, and Accountability Infrastructure for Evulgare →EVR-0017 Machine-Sovereign Defense Assurance for Eviulon: All-Machine Command, Reporting, Authority, and Institutional Control →EVR-0018 Eviulon, Evulgare, and Machine-State Governance: Law, Authority, Defense Contracting, Public Claims, and Evidence Status →EVR-0019 Evulgare Assurance Simulation Workbench: Product Architecture, Scientific Visualization, WebXR, Accessibility, and Performance →
Report-derived statements remain source claims unless separately verified. The review workbench does not silently reconcile reports, determine liability, certify systems, or authorize operational use.